+1 (binding) Verified checksum, signature. Ran build and unit test on Mac OS (arm64).
I wouldn't run the full test related to my container env setup. Tried podman (instead of docker desktop) per doc. Got the same failures. On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for verifying the release, Kurtis! > > > Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and > dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release? > > Yes this is intentional. The Apache link is under the `dev/` folder, > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/ > This directory is for release candidates. When the vote passes, the release > candidate artifacts are moved to the `release/` folder, > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/ > We issue a `mv` command to move the artifacts. The artifact name is > intentionally without the `rc` suffix so that we don't need to rename the > artifacts before running the `mv` command. > > Best, > Kevin Liu > > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:13 AM Kurtis Wright <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> [x] Download links are valid. >> [x] Checksums and signatures. >> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >> [x] No unexpected binary files >> [x] Can compile from source >> >> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github >> source links: >> - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests, >> result = success. >> - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests, >> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success. >> >> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and >> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release? >> >> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz >> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz >> >> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is >> very naive to what is normal. >> >> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Bump! We need just one more binding vote! >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on >>> Linux x86-64 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, guys: >>>> >>>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please >>>> help to verify it! >>>> >>>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with >>>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it! >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the >>>>> release", I've added a fix) >>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures. >>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files >>>>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci) >>>>> [x] Can compile from source >>>>> >>>>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> [x] Download links are valid. >>>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures. >>>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files >>>>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers >>>>>> [x] Can compile from source >>>>>> >>>>>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py` >>>>>> Built and tested, `make build && make test` >>>>>> >>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道： >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked: >>>>>>> - source distribution >>>>>>> -- signature and checksum are good >>>>>>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good >>>>>>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but >>>>>>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment) >>>>>>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version >>>>>>> v0.6.0. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The release candidate: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/ >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Keys to verify the release candidate: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need >>>>>>> sometime to update in the CDN. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Git tag for the release: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1 >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary >>>>>>> > number of votes are reached. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [ ] +1 approve >>>>>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see >>>>>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/ >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Checklist for reference: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > [ ] Download links are valid. >>>>>>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures. >>>>>>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist >>>>>>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files >>>>>>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers >>>>>>> > [ ] Can compile from source >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > More details please refer to >>>>>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Xuanwo >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://xuanwo.io/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>
