Thanks for verifying and voting, Steven. We now have 3 binding votes 🚀

Kurtis has opened a PR to improve the docs around docker and podman
https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1553
I'll also try to reproduce the issue with podman locally.

Best,
Kevin Liu

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:59 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified checksum, signature. Ran build and unit test  on Mac OS (arm64).
>
> I wouldn't run the full test related to my container env setup. Tried
> podman (instead of docker desktop) per doc. Got the same failures.
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for verifying the release, Kurtis!
>>
>> > Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
>> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>>
>> Yes this is intentional. The Apache link is under the `dev/` folder,
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>> This directory is for release candidates. When the vote passes, the release
>> candidate artifacts are moved to the `release/` folder,
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/iceberg/
>> We issue a `mv` command to move the artifacts. The artifact name is
>> intentionally without the `rc` suffix so that we don't need to rename the
>> artifacts before running the `mv` command.
>>
>> Best,
>> Kevin Liu
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 7:13 AM Kurtis Wright <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>
>>> Ran `make build && make test` from both dist.apache.org and Github
>>> source links:
>>>  - on Mac with M1 (arm64) CPU using Orbstack for integration tests,
>>> result = success.
>>>  - on Linux with x86_64 CPU using Podman for integration tests,
>>> encountered errors not related to release sent PR. With PR result = success.
>>>
>>> Question, I noticed a naming difference between Github link and
>>> dist.apache.org link. Is there any concern this will affect the release?
>>>
>>> Apache = apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-src.tar.gz
>>> Github = iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc.1.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Context: First time helping verify a release so the above question is
>>> very naive to what is normal.
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2025, at 09:39, Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Bump! We need just one more binding vote!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 8:18 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>
>>>> Verified checksums/signatures/LICENSE/NOTICE. Ran make build/test on
>>>> Linux x86-64
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 3:03 AM Renjie Liu <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, guys:
>>>>>
>>>>> We still need at least 2 binding votes to pass the release, so please
>>>>> help to verify it!
>>>>>
>>>>> We have achieved some exciting progress, like new tx api, reading with
>>>>> deletions, and hopes this release will help more user to adopt it!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 11:44 AM Renjie Liu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [x] Download links are valid. (there's a typo with "Git tag for the
>>>>>> release", I've added a fix)
>>>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>> [] All source files have ASF headers (This is checked in ci)
>>>>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I ran `make build && make test` on macbook with m4 chip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 10:25 PM NOTME ZE <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>> [x] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>> [x] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>>> [x] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>> [x] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>> [x] Can compile from source
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ran `./scripts/verify.py`
>>>>>>> Built and tested, `make build && make test`
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> 于2025年7月22日周二 20:20写道:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I checked:
>>>>>>>> - source distribution
>>>>>>>> -- signature and checksum are good
>>>>>>>> -- LICENSE and NOTICE are good
>>>>>>>> -- ASF header present in expected files (tsv files don't have it but
>>>>>>>> it's normal as tsv doesn't really support comment)
>>>>>>>> -- No binary file found in the source distribution
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 5:50 AM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hello, Apache Iceberg Rust Community,
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Iceberg rust version
>>>>>>>> v0.6.0.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The tag to be voted on is 0.6.0-rc.1.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The release candidate:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-rust-0.6.0-rc1/
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Keys to verify the release candidate:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I'm using my new key to sign this release, so it might need
>>>>>>>> sometime to update in the CDN.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Git tag for the release:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/releases/tag/0.6.0-rc.1
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the
>>>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>> > number of votes are reached.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>>>> > [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > To learn more about Apache Iceberg, please see
>>>>>>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Checklist for reference:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [ ] Download links are valid.
>>>>>>>> > [ ] Checksums and signatures.
>>>>>>>> > [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
>>>>>>>> > [ ] No unexpected binary files
>>>>>>>> > [ ] All source files have ASF headers
>>>>>>>> > [ ] Can compile from source
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > More details please refer to
>>>>>>>> https://rust.iceberg.apache.org/release.html#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Xuanwo
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > https://xuanwo.io/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to