+1 Op di 19 aug 2025 om 18:08 schreef Steve <[email protected]>:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:23 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:50 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:33 PM Hussein Awala <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:35 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to mark 503 as non-retryable >>>>>>>> error code for the Update Table. As it can lead to table corruption >>>>>>>> otherwise. The proposed language in the spec pr also gives rooms for >>>>>>>> servers who still want to use 503 for retries. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13619/files >>>>>>>> Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg8m058z1jy9dss7jotx6g8h9ko1fxho >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
