+1 (binding) On Tue, Aug 19, 2025, 2:54 PM Marc Cenac <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:09 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Op di 19 aug 2025 om 18:08 schreef Steve <[email protected]>: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 8:43 AM Russell Spitzer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 10:28 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 5:23 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:50 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 4:33 PM Hussein Awala <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Steven Wu <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:35 PM Prashant Singh < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>> I propose an update to the Rest Spec to mark 503 as non-retryable >>>>>>>>>> error code for the Update Table. As it can lead to table corruption >>>>>>>>>> otherwise. The proposed language in the spec pr also gives rooms for >>>>>>>>>> servers who still want to use 503 for retries. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For details please check: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13619/files >>>>>>>>>> Discuss Thread: >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg8m058z1jy9dss7jotx6g8h9ko1fxho >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
