+1. I think stale PR actions could remind authors and reviewers of PRs they might have forgotten.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 1:09 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> wrote: > >Should we also consider adding a github action to close stale prs? > > I think other languages deferred on stale PRs but we can maybe see how the > stale issues go and to the same for stale PRs it if works well? > > On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:01 PM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for adding this. Should we also consider adding a github action to >> close stale prs? >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:44 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 I think it's a good idea to add this. It's been helpful for pyiceberg >>> to clean up stale issues. The author can reopen as needed. >>> >>> Best, >>> Kevin Liu >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:17 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Iceberg Rust Devs, >>>> I opened https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1665 to copy the >>>> configuration from iceberg-python to mark issues as stale and eventually >>>> close them. >>>> >>>> This was already discussed for Java [1] and as noted it also happens >>>> for python. I just wanted to make sure there aren't any objections to >>>> turning it on for rust. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Micah >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hlkwn0f2lgn2od5f3zxdtzsh4lxcp04w >>>> >>>
