> I think other languages deferred on stale PRs but we can maybe see how the stale issues go and to the same for stale PRs it if works well?
Sounds reasonable to me. On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:18 PM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1. I think stale PR actions could remind authors and reviewers of PRs > they might have forgotten. > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 1:09 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >Should we also consider adding a github action to close stale prs? >> >> I think other languages deferred on stale PRs but we can maybe see how >> the stale issues go and to the same for stale PRs it if works well? >> >> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 11:01 PM Renjie Liu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 for adding this. Should we also consider adding a github action to >>> close stale prs? >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:44 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 I think it's a good idea to add this. It's been helpful for >>>> pyiceberg to clean up stale issues. The author can reopen as needed. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Kevin Liu >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 9:17 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Iceberg Rust Devs, >>>>> I opened https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/1665 to copy the >>>>> configuration from iceberg-python to mark issues as stale and eventually >>>>> close them. >>>>> >>>>> This was already discussed for Java [1] and as noted it also happens >>>>> for python. I just wanted to make sure there aren't any objections to >>>>> turning it on for rust. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Micah >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hlkwn0f2lgn2od5f3zxdtzsh4lxcp04w >>>>> >>>>
