+1 (binding)

- Verified signature, checksum, license.
- Build + test passed using openjdk 21.0.7 2025-04-15 LTS
- LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
- No unexpected binary files
- Ran a few examples on Spark
- Ran against pyiceberg CI [1]

I double checked all the new commits and verified that there are no
additional dependency updates.

Thanks again for running the release, Huaxin!

Best,
Kevin Liu


P.S. I previously had issues running all the tests at once and kept
encountering an “address in use” error for
`RESTCompatibilityKitCatalogTests` and
`RESTCompatibilityKitViewCatalogTests`. It turns out the problem might have
been caused by having both Docker Desktop and Orbstack installed. If anyone
else runs into similar issues, try removing one of them.

[1] https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/30

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 7:22 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature
> 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries
> 3. Compiled the source code
> 4. Verified license files / headers
> 5. Ran Flink tests
>
> -Max
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 7:16 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> Verified Checksum/sig/RAT checks/ Ran build and test with JDK21.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:28 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> + 1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> 1. Verified the signature against the KEYS
>>> 2. Verified the SHA-512 checksum
>>> 3. dev/check-license passed
>>> 4. Ran a Gradle clean build locally on macOS, and it passed as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 4:29 PM Yuya Ebihara <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> Confirmed that Trino CI is green with "orgapacheiceberg-1276"
>>>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC
>>>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and
>>>> Snowflake.
>>>>
>>>> Yuya
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:24 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Verified the checksum and signature
>>>>> 2. Ran license check
>>>>> 3. Build passed (excepted for testcontainers tests due to docker API
>>>>> version mismatch with docker desktop)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>> Iceberg 1.10.1 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The commit ID is ccb8bc435062171e64bc8b7e5f56e6aed9c5b934
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/ccb8bc435062171e64bc8b7e5f56e6aed9c5b934
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1276/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>>>>> encouraged to cast
>>>>>>
>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huaxin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Neelesh S. Salian
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to