+1 (binding)

Verified Sigs, Checksum, License
Build and Test

Could only run some tests after bumping testContainers but that's
apparently an OSX Docker Desktop compatibility issue.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 10:43 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified signature, checksum, license.
> - Build + test passed using openjdk 21.0.7 2025-04-15 LTS
> - LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Ran a few examples on Spark
> - Ran against pyiceberg CI [1]
>
> I double checked all the new commits and verified that there are no
> additional dependency updates.
>
> Thanks again for running the release, Huaxin!
>
> Best,
> Kevin Liu
>
>
> P.S. I previously had issues running all the tests at once and kept
> encountering an “address in use” error for
> `RESTCompatibilityKitCatalogTests` and
> `RESTCompatibilityKitViewCatalogTests`. It turns out the problem might have
> been caused by having both Docker Desktop and Orbstack installed. If anyone
> else runs into similar issues, try removing one of them.
>
> [1] https://github.com/kevinjqliu/iceberg-python/pull/30
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 7:22 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> 1. Verified the archive checksum and signature
>> 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries
>> 3. Compiled the source code
>> 4. Verified license files / headers
>> 5. Ran Flink tests
>>
>> -Max
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 7:16 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>> Verified Checksum/sig/RAT checks/ Ran build and test with JDK21.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:28 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> + 1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> 1. Verified the signature against the KEYS
>>>> 2. Verified the SHA-512 checksum
>>>> 3. dev/check-license passed
>>>> 4. Ran a Gradle clean build locally on macOS, and it passed as well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 4:29 PM Yuya Ebihara <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Confirmed that Trino CI is green with "orgapacheiceberg-1276"
>>>>> It runs tests against several catalogs, including HMS, Glue, JDBC
>>>>> (PostgreSQL), REST (Polaris, Unity, S3 Tables, Tabular), Nessie, and
>>>>> Snowflake.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yuya
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 7:24 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Verified the checksum and signature
>>>>>> 2. Ran license check
>>>>>> 3. Build passed (excepted for testcontainers tests due to docker API
>>>>>> version mismatch with docker desktop)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 11:52 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
>>>>>>> Iceberg 1.10.1 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The commit ID is ccb8bc435062171e64bc8b7e5f56e6aed9c5b934
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * This corresponds to the tag: apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/commits/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/ccb8bc435062171e64bc8b7e5f56e6aed9c5b934
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/iceberg/apache-iceberg-1.10.1-rc2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
>>>>>>> repository URL is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheiceberg-1276/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please download, verify, and test.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Instructions for verifying a release can be found here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * https://iceberg.apache.org/how-to-release/#how-to-verify-a-release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Iceberg 1.10.1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members are
>>>>>>> encouraged to cast
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> non-binding votes. This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1
>>>>>>> votes and more binding
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 votes than -1 votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Huaxin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Neelesh S. Salian
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to