+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 7:22 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026, 06:04 Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1, sorry it got lost in my inbox >> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 4:48 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 8:19 PM roryqi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> huaxin gao <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 11:02写道： >>>> > >>>> > +1 (non-binding) >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 5:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> +1 (binding); I approved the PR a long time ago, but forgot to vote. >>>> >> >>>> >> Yufei >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 10:01 AM Prashant Singh >>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hey Everyone, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I hope you all are having a great start to the new year! >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Now since the server side scan planning can vend cred [1], I want to >>>> >>> propose adding the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the spec for >>>> >>> these endpoints send by client to server, to have consistency from >>>> >>> other endpoints that vends creds and to only mint the creds via this >>>> >>> endpoint only when the client wants. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Please ref: >>>> >>> Discuss thread : >>>> >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w45r0rrlzyn8v1gzkkqzry8tkbfd0w86 >>>> >>> Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14781 >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Looking forward to your thoughts and feedback. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vq6nzsc0vs81r8dhr94dp222s0gq1ykw >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Thanks, >>>> >>> Prashant Singh
