+1 (non-binding)

Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> schrieb am Do. 5. Feb. 2026 um
18:38:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:02 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 2:33 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 7:22 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026, 06:04 Eduard Tudenhöfner <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> +1, sorry it got lost in my inbox
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 4:48 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +1 binding
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 8:19 PM roryqi <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> huaxin gao <[email protected]> 于2026年2月5日周四 11:02写道:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > +1 (non-binding)
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 5:18 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> +1 (binding); I approved the PR a long time ago, but forgot to
>>> vote.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> Yufei
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 10:01 AM Prashant Singh <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Hey Everyone,
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> I hope you all are having a great start to the new year!
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Now since the server side scan planning can vend cred [1], I
>>> want to propose adding the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the spec
>>> for these endpoints send by client to server, to have consistency from
>>> other endpoints that vends creds and to only mint the creds via this
>>> endpoint only when the client wants.
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Please ref:
>>> >>>> >>> Discuss thread :
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/w45r0rrlzyn8v1gzkkqzry8tkbfd0w86
>>> >>>> >>> Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14781
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Looking forward to your thoughts and feedback.
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> [1]
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/vq6nzsc0vs81r8dhr94dp222s0gq1ykw
>>> >>>> >>>
>>> >>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>>> >>> Prashant Singh
>>>
>>

Reply via email to