+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 2026/06/09 17:12:39 Russell Spitzer wrote: > > +1 for having the draft up > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:32 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:05 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> I'm +1 (non-binding) to get the spec in. > > >> > > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < > > >> [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) for adding this to version control > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:30 PM Péter Váry < > [email protected]> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Seems like a good way forward, even if we need to iron out the > details. > > >>>> We will need a good compression for the delete vectors if we would > like > > >>>> to store then in the metadata files. > > >>>> > > >>>> +1 for adding an initial draft > > >>>> > > >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. jún. > 9., > > >>>> K, 2:47): > > >>>> > > >>>>> I had a comment about the exception offsets, but +1 (binding) from > me. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:08 PM Micah Kornfield < > [email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding for me). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I left some comments that I think might help with clarity for > > >>>>>> implementers. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Ryan, given the limited nature of the vote, what do you see as the > > >>>>>> decision factors for actually using this? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>> Micah > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 from me > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I mentioned in the thread on adding a bitmap format for small > > >>>>>>>> bitmaps that I think the next steps are to get a draft spec > into git (PR > > >>>>>>>> #16518 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16518>) and > then > > >>>>>>>> iterate on it and implementations. That will give us more > information to > > >>>>>>>> move forward with the Mumbling bitmap format in v4 metadata or > not. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> This vote is to add the spec to version control. It does not > mean > > >>>>>>>> that we are using the format in tables or other places. Those > uses will be > > >>>>>>>> covered by future votes. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Add the Mumbling bitmap spec > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec to git because . . . > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Ryan > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >
