+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:26 PM Prashant Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for getting started with the draft, thanks Ryan ! > > Best, > Prashant > > > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:22 PM Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:08 PM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > Thanks >> > Szehon >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:24 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> >> On 2026/06/09 17:12:39 Russell Spitzer wrote: >> >> > +1 for having the draft up >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 11:32 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > +1 (binding) >> >> > > >> >> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:05 AM Anoop Johnson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > >> I'm +1 (non-binding) to get the spec in. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 8:18 PM Eduard Tudenhöfner < >> >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >>> +1 (binding) for adding this to version control >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 1:30 PM Péter Váry < >> [email protected]> >> >> > >>> wrote: >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>>> Seems like a good way forward, even if we need to iron out the >> details. >> >> > >>>> We will need a good compression for the delete vectors if we >> would like >> >> > >>>> to store then in the metadata files. >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> +1 for adding an initial draft >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>> Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. >> jún. 9., >> >> > >>>> K, 2:47): >> >> > >>>> >> >> > >>>>> I had a comment about the exception offsets, but +1 (binding) >> from me. >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:08 PM Micah Kornfield < >> [email protected]> >> >> > >>>>> wrote: >> >> > >>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> +1 (non-binding for me). >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> I left some comments that I think might help with clarity for >> >> > >>>>>> implementers. >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> Ryan, given the limited nature of the vote, what do you see >> as the >> >> > >>>>>> decision factors for actually using this? >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> Cheers, >> >> > >>>>>> Micah >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> +1 from me >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> I mentioned in the thread on adding a bitmap format for >> small >> >> > >>>>>>>> bitmaps that I think the next steps are to get a draft spec >> into git (PR >> >> > >>>>>>>> #16518 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16518>) >> and then >> >> > >>>>>>>> iterate on it and implementations. That will give us more >> information to >> >> > >>>>>>>> move forward with the Mumbling bitmap format in v4 metadata >> or not. >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> This vote is to add the spec to version control. It does >> not mean >> >> > >>>>>>>> that we are using the format in tables or other places. >> Those uses will be >> >> > >>>>>>>> covered by future votes. >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours: >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1: Add the Mumbling bitmap spec >> >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0: . . . >> >> > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1: Do not add the spec to git because . . . >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>> Ryan >> >> > >>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>> >> >> > >> >
