+1 (non-binding)
On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 5:40 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > Sung > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 12:06 PM Christian Thiel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Yufei Gu <[email protected]> schrieb am So. 25. Okt. 2026 um 04:30: >>> >>> +1 >>> Yufei >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 7:32 PM youngrae kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I'd like to start a vote on adding `none` to the allowed values of the >>>> X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the REST catalog spec: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18480 >>>> >>>> The value `none` signals that the client is able to operate without any >>>> access delegation mechanism. This follows the discussion in the thread >>>> "[DISCUSS] REST spec: expected server behavior when >>>> X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation cannot be satisfied", where Dan and Dmitri >>>> agreed that only this addition is needed. The PR is approved by Dan, >>>> Dmitri and Alexandre. >>>> >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add `none` to the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header values >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 I have concerns because ... >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Youngrae
