+1 On Mon, Oct 26, 2026 at 10:36 AM Alex Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 5:40 PM Sung Yun <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > Sung > > > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 12:06 PM Christian Thiel < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Yufei Gu <[email protected]> schrieb am So. 25. Okt. 2026 um 04:30: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> Yufei > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 7:32 PM youngrae kim <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi everyone, > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to start a vote on adding `none` to the allowed values of > the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header in the REST catalog spec: > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/18480 > >>>> > >>>> The value `none` signals that the client is able to operate without > any access delegation mechanism. This follows the discussion in the thread > "[DISCUSS] REST spec: expected server behavior when > X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation cannot be satisfied", where Dan and Dmitri > agreed that only this addition is needed. The PR is approved by Dan, Dmitri > and Alexandre. > >>>> > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >>>> > >>>> [ ] +1 Add `none` to the X-Iceberg-Access-Delegation header values > >>>> [ ] +0 > >>>> [ ] -1 I have concerns because ... > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Youngrae >
