On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> This doesn't answers the question. First, Java Timestamp has greater > precision than .Net DateTime, so silent data loss could happen in this case > as well. Second, "use timestamp" is defined on class level. It means we > cannot handle a class which have both Date and Timestamp fields. > > Looks like a bug and/or invalid design for me. > Agree, current design is not ideal. Vladimir, do you have other suggestions? > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Keep in mind that separating them can introduce difficulties for other > > > platforms. > > > For example, DateTime in .Net has more precision (100ns vs 1ms in > Java). > > > Serializing this in Java format will lead to data loss. Serializing > .Net > > > DateTime as Timestamp will preserve precision, but may hurt > > > interoperability. > > > > > > > Thanks Pavel. This is exactly the reason why Date vs Timestamp selection > it > > is implemented right now via a configuration flag. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I would definitely remove such a mapping if no one explains a reason > we > > > > have it. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/6/2015 10:26 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: > > > > > > > >> Igniters, > > > >> > > > >> For some reason we "merged" Date and Timestamp types in portable > > > >> marshaller. They are both written in the same format with the same > > type > > > >> ID. > > > >> And how date is interpreted on read side - as Date or as Timestamp - > > > >> depends on configuration flag "use timestamp". > > > >> > > > >> Is there are reason why we do this? Transparent conversion from > > > Timestamp > > > >> to Date is invalid use case because it leads to data loss. Looks > like > > we > > > >> can separate these types from each other and remove this strange > > > >> configuration parameter. > > > >> > > > >> Thoughts? > > > >> > > > >> Vladimir. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > Pavel Tupitsyn > > > GridGain Systems, Inc. > > > www.gridgain.com > > > > > >