On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> This doesn't answers the question. First, Java Timestamp has greater
> precision than .Net DateTime, so silent data loss could happen in this case
> as well. Second, "use timestamp" is defined on class level. It means we
> cannot handle a class which have both Date and Timestamp fields.
>
> Looks like a bug and/or invalid design for me.
>

Agree, current design is not ideal. Vladimir, do you have other suggestions?


>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Keep in mind that separating them can introduce difficulties for other
> > > platforms.
> > > For example, DateTime in .Net has more precision (100ns vs 1ms in
> Java).
> > > Serializing this in Java format will lead to data loss. Serializing
> .Net
> > > DateTime as Timestamp will preserve precision, but may hurt
> > > interoperability.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Pavel. This is exactly the reason why Date vs Timestamp selection
> it
> > is implemented right now via a configuration flag.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would definitely remove such a mapping if no one explains a reason
> we
> > > > have it.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Denis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 10/6/2015 10:26 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Igniters,
> > > >>
> > > >> For some reason we "merged" Date and Timestamp types in portable
> > > >> marshaller. They are both written in the same format with the same
> > type
> > > >> ID.
> > > >> And how date is interpreted on read side - as Date or as Timestamp -
> > > >> depends on configuration flag "use timestamp".
> > > >>
> > > >> Is there are reason why we do this? Transparent conversion from
> > > Timestamp
> > > >> to Date is invalid use case because it leads to data loss. Looks
> like
> > we
> > > >> can separate these types from each other and remove this strange
> > > >> configuration parameter.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thoughts?
> > > >>
> > > >> Vladimir.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Pavel Tupitsyn
> > > GridGain Systems, Inc.
> > > www.gridgain.com
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to