Can/will this include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1681 ?

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> Branch ignite-1.5 created.
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > I assume that correct link at 10th feature is
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-638
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> I think we can start preparation to Ignite-1.5 release which will
> include
> >> many interesting features:
> >>
> >> 1. Portable object API
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1486
> >>
> >> 2. Ignite.NET and Ignite C++
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1282
> >>
> >> 3. Optimistic serializable transactions
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1607
> >>
> >> 4. Distributed SQL joins - we will be able to query non-collocated data
> as
> >> well
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1232
> >>
> >> 5. Enhanced Oracle and IBM JDK interoperability
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526
> >>
> >> 6. MQTT streamer
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-535
> >>
> >> 7. Continuous query failover
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426
> >>
> >> 8. Significant transactional cache performance optimizations - I will
> >> merge
> >> these changes from 'ignite-1.4-slow-server-debug' today or tomorrow.
> >>
> >> 9. Many stability and fault-tolerance fixes.
> >>
> >> 10. I would also like to include distributed Semaphore. Vladislav, any
> >> chance you can finish with it this week?
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-426>638
> >>
> >> Thanks to everyone involved! Guys, esp. assignees of mentioned issues,
> >> please respond to this email and let us know when can we expect your
> >> changes being merged to master and release branch?
> >>
> >> Can someone create ignite-1.5 release branch?
> >>
> >> --Yakov
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to