As far as I understand, the issue is that CacheJdbcStoreExample and CacheSpringStoreExample use in-memory H2 database, so the cache store is not shared among nodes. What if we just switch to a file-based DB? It looks like a simple change to me.
And I would remove CacheDummyStoreExample. It looks weird and doesn't demonstrate anything that is not shown in other store examples. -Val On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > I think we should fix all the examples. What has changed that makes these > examples so difficult to fix? > > I really do not like removing the examples that have been continuously > shipped in every release. If it is so difficult for us to upgrade them to > 1.5, how difficult will it be for our users? > > D. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > We still have very advanced and cool CacheBinaryAutoStoreExample and it > > works properly > > > > --Yakov > > > > 2015-12-15 18:11 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > > > If it is an example issue, why can’t we fix the examples? I am not > > > comfortable removing CacheJdbcStoreExample from the release. > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2158 > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > It seems that CacheDummyStoreExample, CacheJdbcStoreExample and > > > > CacheSpringStoreExample do not work correctly in distributed > > environment > > > > after code modifications to demonstrate clear() and withSkipStore() > > > > > > > > This is an old issue and it is 100% examples' issue, so I suggest > > > removing > > > > them from 1.5 and fix and return back to distro in 1.6 > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > >
