IGNITE-4303 is most likely fixed by IGNITE-4280 fix (already merged in 1.8 branch).
Meanwhile everything SQL/DML related seems to be in pull requests/reviewed/fixed/merged (no issues unapproached/not fixed). - Alex 2016-11-24 22:59 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <[email protected]>: > Hi > > I found two issues for 1.8: > IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because > node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304> > IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303> > > Could someone experienced take a look? > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems >> with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8 >> branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next >> release (1.9, 2.0?). >> >> Any objections? >> >> Vladimir. >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Denis, >> > >> > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we >> > have some >> > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There >> is a >> > ticket for >> > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Igor >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Alexander, >> > > >> > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! >> > > >> > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I >> > start >> > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? >> > > >> > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < >> > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> >> > > >> > > — >> > > Denis >> > > >> > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Folks, >> > > > >> > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to >> > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. >> > > > >> > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be >> > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. >> > > > >> > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features >> on >> > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): >> > > > >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 >> > > > >> > > > On failing tests: >> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? >> > > focusedCommentId=15683377 >> > > > >> > > > - Alex >> > > > >> > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko >> > > > <[email protected]>: >> > > >> Vlad, >> > > >> >> > > >> Most likely today. >> > > >> >> > > >> - Alex >> > > >> >> > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <[email protected]>: >> > > >>> Igniters, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that >> we >> > > are >> > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest >> remaining >> > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 >> as >> > > soon >> > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might >> happen? >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Vladimir. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Roman, >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently >> > there >> > > was >> > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties >> related >> > to >> > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions >> > > co-exist at >> > > >>>> the same time. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the >> > > documentation >> > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden >> > page >> > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once >> the >> > > next >> > > >>>> version is created after the release. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix >> > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create >> > > readme.io < >> > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> td10868.html >> > < >> > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >> > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- >> > td10868.html> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> — >> > > >>>> Denis >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh >> > <[email protected] >> > > > >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Denis, >> > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? >> > > >>>>> -Roman >> > > >>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < >> > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> Igor, >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into >> 1.8 >> > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall >> merge >> > > >>>> happens. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> — >> > > >>>>> Denis >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> Denis, >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they >> will >> > > >>>> break tests >> > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that >> before >> > > DML >> > > >>>> is merged. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my >> > > changes >> > > >>>> and check >> > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and >> > > examples >> > > >>>> are ready. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> Best Regards, >> > > >>>>>> Igor >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < >> > > [email protected] >> > > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor >> > binary >> > > >>>> mode) >> > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. >> > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I >> > > can't >> > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >> > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected] >> > > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes >> into >> > > 1.8 >> > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation >> > > and be >> > > >>>> sure >> > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,* >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET >> > usability >> > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite >> > users? >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >> > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < >> > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> — >> > > >>>>>>> Denis >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <[email protected] >> > > <mailto: >> > > >>>> [email protected]>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can >> take >> > > over >> > > >>>> the >> > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8? >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> — >> > > >>>>>>> Denis >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >> > > >>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@ >> > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly >> > > about >> > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify >> > streamer's >> > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily). >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash >> > codes >> > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I >> > will >> > > ask >> > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in >> > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows: >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >> > > >>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >> > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >> > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto >> > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very >> > hashing >> > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So >> > > could >> > > >>>>>>> you please take a look? >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> - Alex >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > -- > Sergey Kozlov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com
