Folks, Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created.
Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features on time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 On failing tests: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294?focusedCommentId=15683377 - Alex 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: > Vlad, > > Most likely today. > > - Alex > > 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: >> Igniters, >> >> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that we are >> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest remaining >> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 as soon >> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might happen? >> >> Vladimir. >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Roman, >>> >>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently there was >>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties related to >>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions co-exist at >>> the same time. >>> >>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the documentation >>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden page >>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once the next >>> version is created after the release. >>> >>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix >>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create readme.io < >>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. >>> >>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html < >>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. >>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io-td10868.html> >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Denis, >>> > Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? >>> > -Roman >>> > On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < >>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Igor, >>> > >>> > It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into 1.8 >>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall merge >>> happens. >>> > >>> > — >>> > Denis >>> > >>> >> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Denis, >>> >> >>> >> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they will >>> break tests >>> >> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that before DML >>> is merged. >>> >> >>> >> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my changes >>> and check >>> >> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and examples >>> are ready. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Best Regards, >>> >> Igor >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org >>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor binary >>> mode) >>> >> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. >>> >> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I can't >>> >> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. >>> >> >>> >> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. >>> >> >>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> >>> >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org >>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* >>> >>> >>> >>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes into 1.8 >>> >>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation and be >>> sure >>> >>> that everything works as described on my side. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Pavel,* >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET usability >>> >>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite users? >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> >>> >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> >>> >>> >>> >>> — >>> >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com <mailto: >>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can take over >>> the >>> >>> release process of 1.8? >>> >>> >>> >>> — >>> >>> Denis >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < >>> >>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@ >>> gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Current status on DML: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly about >>> >>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify streamer's >>> >>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily). >>> >>> >>> >>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. >>> >>> >>> >>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash codes >>> >>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I will ask >>> >>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in >>> >>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows: >>> >>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing >>> >>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity >>> >>> - testPutWithCustomHashing >>> >>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto >>> >>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very hashing >>> >>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So could >>> >>> you please take a look? >>> >>> >>> >>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>>
