Denis, About your question: 'putIfAbsent' is used only when we have single key-value pair to process as long as we don't have method like 'put all if absent'. When there's a bunch of pairs, an entry processor is created for each pair to make its processing atomic (effectively CAS style processing), and all those processors are then executed via 'invokeAll'.
- Alex 2016-12-09 8:17 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > Alexander, thanks for all the material you’ve prepared so far. > > Actually, I’ve reviewed, restructured and released only a part of it [1]. > > The rest, that is missing, requires more time from my side and I’ll be > releasing additional blocks throughout the next week. The full documentation > with the unreviewed parts is invisible and located here [2]. > > Please don’t modify neither of the docs ([1] and [2]) until I’ve finished > with the overall review. Send all your suggestions over the email. > > At the moment I have the following question. What cache method(s) do we > convert INSERT statements to [3]? Is it ‘putIfAbsent’? > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/dml > [2] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-dml-to-be-reviewe > [3] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/dml#section-insert > > — > Denis > > On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:35 AM, Alexander Paschenko > <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Denis, > > it's all ready, JDBC driver page is also updated (I've created a > hidden clone page, please find it on the left) as well as one on > binary marshaller. Also I've renamed 'distributed DML' page to just > 'DML' as long as there's much less to distribution of DML operations > themselves than to queries and there's clearly no need to make another > doc page to distinguish. Removed batches mention from limitations. > > - Alex > > 2016-12-08 5:26 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > Alexander, > > How close are you to the finalization of the DML doc? > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-dml > > Since we’re approaching 1.8 release I would like to do a final review of it > polishing whatever is needed tomorrow. > > As I see that only the limitations section is left. The first note is that I > wouldn’t mention “JDBC Batching mode” for now because this is something that > doesn’t affect the usability and SQL API's scope of support. > > — > Denis > > >
