Internally we still use int[] when we send partitions (see
GridH2QueryRequest.parts). It looks like we only do more work with
PartitionSet.

I like the idea of bitset for partitions, but

1. We have to change internals first to use it, otherwise the optimization
makes no sense.
2. We will need to have a method SqlQuery.setPartitions(int... parts) for
usability reasons anyways.

Thus I suggest for now to go the straightforward way with int[] and create
a separate ticket describing the optimization with bitset.

Sergi

2017-01-13 13:06 GMT+03:00 Alexei Scherbakov <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com>:

> PartitionSet hides internal implementation of int array.
>
> This allows as to efficiently represent contiguous range of partitions and
> defines clear API for ordered iteration over partitions and containment
> check.
>
> Even better to go with compressed bitmap, as I mentioned in ticket comment.
> This will allow us to minimize heap footprint for this object.
>
> Moreover, it will be useful to create reusable compressed bitmap
> implementation in Ignite and use it in other cases, on example, for
> replacing H2's IntArray and Set<Integer>.
>
> Should I create a ticket for this ?
>
> .
>
> 2017-01-13 1:01 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Sergi Vladykin <
> sergi.vlady...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I looked at the code. The PartitionSet concept looks overengineered to
> > me,
> > > why wouldn't we just go with int[]?
> > >
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Sergi
> > >
> > > 2017-01-12 15:18 GMT+03:00 Alexei Scherbakov <
> > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > >
> > > > Done.
> > > >
> > > > 2017-01-11 20:39 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
> >:
> > > >
> > > > > Alexey,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not sure I am seeing the API changes documented in the ticket.
> > Can
> > > > you
> > > > > please either document them or add GIT links for the new classes?
> > > > >
> > > > > D.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Alexei Scherbakov <
> > > > > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Guys,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've just submitted a PR for
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4523.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please review API changes while waiting for TC results.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Alexei Scherbakov
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Alexei Scherbakov
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best regards,
> Alexei Scherbakov
>

Reply via email to