The site and documentation is improved almost in per day basis. I spot the changes happened to the project on @dev and @user and adjust the materials and site to reflect them with the help of contributirs and committers who worked on a specific functionality. Don't see much sense to generate extra noise while that work is in progress.
That's exactly what happened to the front page. The new memory architecture and the persistent store was discussed on @dev before many times and the site was updated accordingly. -- Denis On Friday, July 28, 2017, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote: > Was there any discussion here on dev@ about this change? Just curious > if my search-foo is failing me... > > Thanks! > -- > With regards, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author, > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing. > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Igniters, > > > > In favor of the 2.1 release we’ve reworked and renewed the front page > and some of the existing pages of the site: > > https://ignite.apache.org > > > > The front page reflects the main additions of 2.1, durable memory + > persistent store, that opened new opportunities for Ignite. Please welcome > new Ignite that “provides in-memory performance with the durability of > disk”: > > https://twitter.com/denismagda/status/890683287852601345 > > > > — > > Denis >
