Hi,

I'm working on WAL optimizations that improve performance
significantly [1]. I believe it's important task and should be
included in Apache Ignite 2.4 release.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6339

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> Basing on the amount of improvements, fixes and features stacked in the 
> master branch I think it’s a right time to negotiate the scope and time of 
> the next Apache Ignite 2.4 release. I’m ready to step in as a release manager 
> if none of the committers wants to try on this role.
>
> Here is a release page:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.4 
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.4>
>
> Proposed time date: Jan 5 - code freeze -> stabilization and testing -> Jan 
> 24 - voting -> Jan 31 release.
>
> In my view improvements such Java 9 support and Java 7 discontinuation, 
> memory metrics in bytes [1], binary client protocol, etc. needs to get into 
> the release. All the features like that are labeled “important” in JIRA. Use 
> this label if you are convinced a task has to be release in 2.4.
>
> What’s about machine learning, bulk loading [2], internals problems 
> resolution [3], metrics [4] related tasks? What goes in 2.4 and what’s 
> shifted?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6902 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6902>
> [2] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-1%3A+Bulk+data+loading+performance+improvements
>  
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-1:+Bulk+data+loading+performance+improvements>
> [3] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-7%3A+Ignite+internal+problems+detection
>  
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-7:+Ignite+internal+problems+detection>
> [4] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-6%3A+Metrics+improvements
>  
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-6:+Metrics+improvements>
>
> —
> Denis

Reply via email to