> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word from every file > in the project, we just need to rename the name of downloadable package.
Couldn’t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for pitching in :) This is exactly what the ticket is about. — Denis > On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin Kulichenko > <valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Anton, > > I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word from every file > in the project, we just need to rename the name of downloadable package. Is > there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed to the user? > > If that's the case, it should not be a big change, no? > > -Val > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > >> Denis, >> >> You're proposing changes without viewing a code :) >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Anton, >>> >>> What’s wrong if we just go ahead and: >>> - replace “fabric” with “ignite” >>> - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop" >>> >>> — >>> Denis >>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com >>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Denis, >>>> >>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same engine. >>>> >>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for example: >>>> dependencies-fabric.xml >>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml >>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml >>>> release-base.xml >>>> release-fabric.xml >>>> release-fabric-base.xml >>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml >>>> release-hadoop.xml >>>> >>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" without "hadoop" >> removal. >>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but that's not a good idea. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5 >>>>> >>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or refactored, e.g. create >>> FS >>>>> directly over the data region without using "cache" entity as an >>>>> intermidiate stage >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Anton, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are related to this task. The >>> project >>>>>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while. Check up the site or docs. >>>>>> >>>>>> The “fabric” word is being removed from all over the places and needs >>> to >>>>>> be removed from the editions’ names. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal position is to retire this >>>>> component >>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the conversation again after we >>> done >>>>>> with 2.4. >>>>>> >>>>>> — >>>>>> Denis >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Denis, Petr, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated* logic with "fabric" >>>>> and >>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? >>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and replace it with >>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead. >>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop" folder from >>> "optional" >>>>>> to >>>>>>> root directory :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix logic from maven poms >> and >>>>>>> simplify release process. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will double-check the >>>>>>>> changes and merge them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some additional tests. See >> PR >>>>>>>> #3315 [1]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 < >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and review the changes? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping them directly: >>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ >>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers < >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ >>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work while preparing RPM >> package. >>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review and merge of >>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1]. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is executed: >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 < >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov < >>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < >>>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis Magda < >>>>>> dma...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still include “fabric” word >> in >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the previous release >> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our side because the project >> has >>>>> not >>>>>>>> been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the name and have the >> binary >>>>>>>> releases >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s make the change in 2.4. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sergey Kozlov >>>>> GridGain Systems >>>>> www.gridgain.com >>>>> >>> >>> >>
