On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Guys, > > After the review in Upsource the configuration parameter was renamed > to txTimeoutOnPartMapSync, and it makes sense to me because PME is an > implementation detail and it may change in future, partition map sync is a > more abstract term. For the same reason I like this parameter being placed > on transactions configuration - we do not have any parameters for PME, so > the configuration property goes to an object which affects a user-exposed > API. > AG, are we going to have any other timeouts on PME, like locks? If yes, then I would still vote of adding PmeTimeout property.
