Can someone explain what is the before and after effect for this change from the usability standpoint. If we are changing BLT for the in-memory mode, which is the default, then we must think through all the usability consequences ahead of time. Otherwise, the perception will be that the product stopped working because someone did not know to activate the cluster.
D. On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm backing up Vladimir's proposal to fix the behavior in 2.5 if it's not > time-consuming. To give you a bit more context on the subj, here is why we > should have the fix to be delivered in 2.5: > http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Problems- > with-persistence-and-partitioned-cache-in-2-4-0-td21325.html > > Frankly, it's not the first time I see similar complaints from those who > are on 2.4. > > Alex G., Vovan, how hard is it to fix this? > > -- > Denis > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 7:56 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > Yakov, > > > > Messages would help users understand what is wrong earlier, but will not > > protect them from additional maintenance which is required in AI 2.4 and > is > > supposed to be removed in next AI releases. > > Please note that in IEP-4 topic I proposed alternative solution - release > > AI 2.5 now, but then release AI 2.6 as soon as BLT is fixed. I.e. it > would > > be emergency release. > > > > Both approaches works for me, the main goal is to deliver original > defaults > > ASAP. However, approach with a single release looks better to me because > it > > will minimize number of migrations for users. > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, how about we release 2.5 in the nearest future after adding > proper > > > usability log messages that will explain user what to do and also > output > > > link to readme.io with the first BLT related message during node > uptime. > > > This should not take much time and we can use the same messages when we > > > have (BL)AT modes in 2.6. I think that adding messages makes sense and > > > should be clear for users which is not the case for 2.4. > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > >
