Even better, if RAM is exhausted page replacement process will be started. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Ignite+Durable+Memory+-+under+the+hood#IgniteDurableMemory-underthehood-Pagereplacement(rotationwithdisk)
Effect of the preloading will be still markable, but not as excelled as with full-fitting into RAM. Later I can review or improve javadocs if it is necessary. ср, 19 сент. 2018 г. в 0:18, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > Agree, it's just a matter of the documentation. If a user stores 100% in > RAM and on disk, and just wants to warm RAM up after a restart then he > knows everything will fit there. If during the preloading we detect that > the RAM is exhausted we can halt it and print out a warning. > > -- > Denis > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:10 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I totally support the idea of cache preload. > > > > IMO it can be expanded. We can iterate over local partitions of the cache > > group and preload each. > > > > But it should be really clear documented methods so a user can be aware > of > > the benefits of such method (e.g. if RAM region is big enough, etc). > > > > Sincerely, > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > вт, 18 сент. 2018 г. в 21:36, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > Since we're adding a method that would preload a certain partition, can > > we > > > add the one which will preload the whole cache? Ignite persistence > users > > > I've been working with look puzzled once they realize there is no way > to > > > warm up RAM after the restart. There are use cases that require this. > > > > > > Can the current optimizations be expanded to the cache preloading use > > case? > > > > > > -- > > > Denis > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:58 AM Alexei Scherbakov < > > > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Summing up, I suggest adding new public > > > > method IgniteCache.preloadPartition(partId). > > > > > > > > I will start preparing PR for IGNITE-8873 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8873> if no more > > > objections > > > > follow. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вт, 18 сент. 2018 г. в 10:50, Alexey Goncharuk < > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy, > > > > > > > > > > In my understanding, the proper fix for the scan query looks like a > > big > > > > > change and it is unlikely that we include it in Ignite 2.7. On the > > > other > > > > > hand, the method suggested by Alexei is quite simple and it > > definitely > > > > > fits Ignite 2.7, which will provide a better user experience. Even > > > > having a > > > > > proper scan query implemented this method can be useful in some > > > specific > > > > > scenarios, so we will not have to deprecate it. > > > > > > > > > > --AG > > > > > > > > > > пн, 17 сент. 2018 г. в 19:15, Dmitriy Pavlov < > dpavlov....@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > As I understood it is not a hack, it is an advanced feature for > > > warming > > > > > up > > > > > > the partition. We can build warm-up of the overall cache by > calling > > > its > > > > > > partitions warm-up. Users often ask about this feature and are > not > > > > > > confident with our lazy upload. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please correct me if I misunderstood the idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 17 сент. 2018 г. в 18:37, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would rather fix the scan than hack the scan. Is there any > > > > technical > > > > > > > reason for hacking it now instead of fixing it properly? Can > some > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > > > experts in this thread provide an estimate of complexity and > > > > difference > > > > > > in > > > > > > > work that would be required for each approach? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:42 PM Alexey Goncharuk < > > > > > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it would be beneficial for some Ignite users if we > > added > > > > > such a > > > > > > > > partition warmup method to the public API. The method should > be > > > > > > > > well-documented and state that it may invalidate existing > page > > > > cache. > > > > > > It > > > > > > > > will be a very effective instrument until we add the proper > > scan > > > > > > ability > > > > > > > > that Vladimir was referring to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 17 сент. 2018 г. в 13:05, Maxim Muzafarov < > > > maxmu...@gmail.com > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Such warming up can be an effective technique for > performing > > > > > > > calculations > > > > > > > > > which required large cache > > > > > > > > > data reads, but I think it's the single narrow use case of > > all > > > > over > > > > > > > > Ignite > > > > > > > > > store usages. Like all other > > > > > > > > > powerfull techniques, we should use it wisely. In the > general > > > > > case, I > > > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > we should consider other > > > > > > > > > techniques mentioned by Vladimir and may create something > > like > > > > > > `global > > > > > > > > > statistics of cache data usage` > > > > > > > > > to choose the best technique in each case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For instance, it's not obvious what would take longer: > > > > multi-block > > > > > > > reads > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > 50 single-block reads issues > > > > > > > > > sequentially. It strongly depends on used hardware under > the > > > hood > > > > > and > > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > depend on workload system > > > > > > > > > resources (CPU-intensive calculations and I\O access) as > > well. > > > > But > > > > > > > > > `statistics` will help us to choose > > > > > > > > > the right way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 23:59 Dmitriy Pavlov < > > > > dpavlov....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alexei, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I did not find any PRs associated with the ticket for > check > > > > code > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > behind this idea. Are there any PRs? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we create some forwards scan of pages, it should be a > > very > > > > > > > > > intellectual > > > > > > > > > > algorithm including a lot of parameters (how much RAM is > > > free, > > > > > how > > > > > > > > > probably > > > > > > > > > > we will need next page, etc). We had the private talk > about > > > > such > > > > > > idea > > > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > time ago. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By my experience, Linux systems already do such forward > > > reading > > > > > of > > > > > > > file > > > > > > > > > > data (for corresponding sequential flagged file > > descriptors), > > > > but > > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > prefetching of data at the level of application may be > > useful > > > > for > > > > > > > > > O_DIRECT > > > > > > > > > > file descriptors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And one more concern from me is about selecting a right > > place > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > system > > > > > > > > > > to do such prefetch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > вс, 16 сент. 2018 г. в 19:54, Vladimir Ozerov < > > > > > > voze...@gridgain.com > > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HI Alex, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is good that you observed speedup. But I do not > > think > > > > this > > > > > > > > > solution > > > > > > > > > > > works for the product in general case. Amount of RAM is > > > > > limited, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > even a > > > > > > > > > > > single partition may need more space than RAM > available. > > > > > Moving a > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > pages to page memory for scan means that you evict a > lot > > of > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > pages, > > > > > > > > > > > what will ultimately lead to bad performance of > > subsequent > > > > > > queries > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > defeat LRU algorithms, which are of great improtance > for > > > good > > > > > > > > database > > > > > > > > > > > performance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Database vendors choose another approach - skip BTrees, > > > > iterate > > > > > > > > > direclty > > > > > > > > > > > over data pages, read them in multi-block fashion, use > > > > separate > > > > > > > scan > > > > > > > > > > buffer > > > > > > > > > > > to avoid excessive evictions of other hot pages. > > > > Corresponding > > > > > > > ticket > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > SQL exists [1], but idea is common for all parts of the > > > > system, > > > > > > > > > requiring > > > > > > > > > > > scans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As far as proposed solution, it might be good idea to > add > > > > > special > > > > > > > API > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > "warmup" partition with clear explanation of pros (fast > > > scan > > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > > warmup) > > > > > > > > > > > and cons (slowdown of any other operations). But I > think > > we > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > make > > > > > > > > > > > this approach part of normal scans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6057 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 6:44 PM Alexei Scherbakov < > > > > > > > > > > > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My use case involves scenario where it's necessary to > > > > iterate > > > > > > > over > > > > > > > > > > > > large(many TBs) persistent cache doing some > calculation > > > on > > > > > read > > > > > > > > data. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The basic solution is to iterate cache using > ScanQuery. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This turns out to be slow because iteration over > cache > > > > > > involves a > > > > > > > > lot > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > random disk access for reading data pages referenced > > from > > > > > leaf > > > > > > > > pages > > > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > links. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is especially true when data is stored on disks > > with > > > > > slow > > > > > > > > random > > > > > > > > > > > > access, like SAS disks. In my case on modern SAS > disks > > > > array > > > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > > > speed > > > > > > > > > > > > was like several MB/sec while sequential read speed > in > > > perf > > > > > > test > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > GB/sec. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was able to fix the issue by using ScanQuery with > > > > explicit > > > > > > > > > partition > > > > > > > > > > > set > > > > > > > > > > > > and running simple warmup code before each partition > > > scan. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The code pins cold pages in memory in sequential > order > > > thus > > > > > > > > > eliminating > > > > > > > > > > > > random disk access. Speedup was like x100 magnitude. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suggest adding the improvement to the product's > core > > > by > > > > > > always > > > > > > > > > > > > sequentially preloading pages for all internal > > partition > > > > > > > iterations > > > > > > > > > > > (cache > > > > > > > > > > > > iterators, scan queries, sql queries with scan plan) > if > > > > > > partition > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > cold > > > > > > > > > > > > (low number of pinned pages). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This also should speed up rebalancing from cold > > > partitions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ignite JIRA ticket [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8873 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Maxim Muzafarov > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > > >
