Got it.

Agree with you.

I think we can finish almost all of this tickets till November.

В Пн, 23/09/2019 в 20:12 +0300, Andrey Gura пишет:
> > > From my point of view monitoring isn't ready for release.
> > Can you clarify, what exactly is not ready?
> > Can we track planned changes somehow?
> 
> We have too many not resolved tickets under IEP-35 label [1]. Also it
> makes sense to do some usability testing: JMX beans interfaces, system
> views, etc.
> 
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20IEP-35
> 
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:04 PM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hello, Andrey.
> > 
> > > From my point of view monitoring isn't ready for release.
> > 
> > Can you clarify, what exactly is not ready?
> > Can we track planned changes somehow?
> > 
> > 
> > В Пн, 23/09/2019 в 17:59 +0300, Andrey Gura пишет:
> > > Igniters,
> > > 
> > > From my point of view monitoring isn't ready for release. So it would
> > > be great to return to this discussion later. It seems that beginning
> > > of November is good time for it.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 5:37 PM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Nikolay Izhikov, ok, let's arrange the talk in ASF slack between 16 and 
> > > > 19
> > > > MSK, is it possible?
> > > > 
> > > > пн, 23 сент. 2019 г. в 17:35, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > > > 
> > > > > Ok, I'll clarify the situation
> > > > > 
> > > > > 1. Currently, the ML module is like a black box for me. What exactly
> > > > > we are expected to get by the code freeze date? Do we have tickets we
> > > > > should address to?
> > > > > 
> > > > > - Yes, we have a few epics that are not finished yet, due to limited 
> > > > > free
> > > > > time the planned dates were written earlier
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2. I think we can move code freeze date to December 11-th but, from
> > > > > your side, do you think that 2-weeks of stabilization and regression
> > > > > will be enough for the master branch living without release for a
> > > > > year?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ok, I've ready to move code freeze to your dates but not to 1 
> > > > > November, it
> > > > > sounds weird (why we should go so fast if haven't released during the 
> > > > > year)
> > > > > I'm against fast releasing without planned dates.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 3. What do you think about that we will make the huge 2.8 release in
> > > > > November with long period of branch stabilization and an additional
> > > > > 2.8.1 release with ML component in January? Such an approach have some
> > > > > advantages like we will not rush the development of ML components.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The best idea here is ability to merge the last ML changes during
> > > > > stabilization period (bug fixing, tests and so on), is it ok for you?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2.8.1 could be a good point, but remind you guys, the normal practice 
> > > > > to
> > > > > plan release for 2 months and ask another maintainers about another 
> > > > > modules
> > > > > maybe the need additional clarification from another committers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > пн, 23 сент. 2019 г. в 13:35, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > +1 to start releasing 2.8 in November or even in the end of October.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Alex, can we schedule some quick meetings in the new Ignite Slack 
> > > > > > chat
> > > > > > and discuss all release date details?
> > > > > > Wendseday, 25 September is good for you?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > В Пн, 23/09/2019 в 13:31 +0300, Maxim Muzafarov пишет:
> > > > > > > Alexey,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Can you, please, clarify some questions.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 1. Currently, the ML module is like a black box for me. What 
> > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > > we are expected to get by the code freeze date? Do we have 
> > > > > > > tickets we
> > > > > > > should address to?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 2. I think we can move code freeze date to December 11-th but, 
> > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > your side, do you think that 2-weeks of stabilization and 
> > > > > > > regression
> > > > > > > will be enough for the master branch living without release for a
> > > > > > > year?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 3. What do you think about that we will make the huge 2.8 release 
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > November with long period of branch stabilization and an 
> > > > > > > additional
> > > > > > > 2.8.1 release with ML component in January? Such an approach have 
> > > > > > > some
> > > > > > > advantages like we will not rush the development of ML components.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 17:24, Alexey Zinoviev 
> > > > > > > <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I wrote about code freeze at  December 18, 2019, ok, we can 
> > > > > > > > move one
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > week
> > > > > > > > earlier to 11 December
> > > > > > > > Voting + Release could be after 10th January.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 15:43, Maxim Muzafarov 
> > > > > > > > <mmu...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Alexey,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > It is not a problem to shift release a bit later or earlier, 
> > > > > > > > > but I'm
> > > > > > > > > strictly against having `code freeze` stage on holidays (the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Christmas
> > > > > > > > > holidays at the end of December and New Year holidays at the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > beginning
> > > > > > > > > of January). From my point, it's better to have it completed 
> > > > > > > > > `code
> > > > > > > > > freeze` stage before December 23th or started after 10th 
> > > > > > > > > January.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 15:09, Dmitriy Pavlov 
> > > > > > > > > <dpav...@apache.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > +1 For Maxim as release manager.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Maxim,
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > It is a good thing that you have committer rights, and most 
> > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > the steps
> > > > > > > > > > you will be able to complete yourself.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > But please engage one from PMC member to complete steps 
> > > > > > > > > > from the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > process where PMC rights are required
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process  
> > > > > > At
> > > > > > > > > > least, access to docker and nuget creds requires PMC 
> > > > > > > > > > membership.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Feel free to ping me, I will assist, as well.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 14:59, Alexey Zinoviev <
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > For Spark and ML components the best dates should be 
> > > > > > > > > > > moved to
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > one month
> > > > > > > > > > > later, what's about?
> > > > > > > > > > > There are a lot of features there, but a lot of bugs and 
> > > > > > > > > > > minor
> > > > > > > > > > > improvements in JIRA too
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Also I support you as a release manager
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: December 4, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > Code Freeze: December 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > Voting Date: January 10, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > Release Date: January 17, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > пт, 20 сент. 2019 г. в 14:44, Maxim Muzafarov <
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > mmu...@apache.org>:
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's almost a year has passed since the last major 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Apache
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Ignite 2.7
> > > > > > > > > > > > has been released. We've accumulated a lot of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > performance
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > improvements
> > > > > > > > > > > > and a lot of new features which are waiting for their 
> > > > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > date.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my list of the most interesting things from my 
> > > > > > > > > > > > point
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > last major release:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Service Grid,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Monitoring,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Recovery Read
> > > > > > > > > > > > BLT auto-adjust,
> > > > > > > > > > > > PDS compression,
> > > > > > > > > > > > WAL page compression,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thin client: best effort affinity,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thin client: transactions support (not yet)
> > > > > > > > > > > > SQL query history
> > > > > > > > > > > > SQL statistics
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should no longer wait and freeze the master 
> > > > > > > > > > > > branch
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > anymore
> > > > > > > > > > > > and prepare the next major release by the end of the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > year.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > I propose to discuss Time, Scope of Apache Ignite 2.8 
> > > > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > also
> > > > > > > > > > > > I want to propose myself to be the release manager of 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > planning
> > > > > > > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Scope Freeze: November 4, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > Code Freeze: November 18, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > Voting Date: December 10, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > Release Date: December 17, 2019
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT?
> > > > > > > > > > > > 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to