Hello Denis, Sure, sounds good. I will create a separate discussion thread to get community feedback on whether we should join the Bahir or kick-off "Ignite Extensions" project.
Regards, Saikat On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:21 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Folks, > > The concept of Apache Bahir is precisely what we need! Saikat, thanks for > doing the research. Why I believe the * idea* fits us well: > > - All integrations can be stored in separate Github repositories and > have their dev lifecycles. We've not obliged to couple all the > integrations > in a single repo. For instance, Spark can be located in a dedicated repo > while streaming integrations might be in a single one. It's up to us. > - All the repositories and integrations belong to ASF. We're not dumping > them on Github but rather keep supporting and developing in accordance > with > ASF vision and practices. > - There is a way to reward contributors via committership and PMC > membership. You won't get this if a project is just one of the millions > of > Github projects. > > Saikat, as Ignite PMC member, could you please kick-off a separate dev-list > discussion to involve more community members and referring to this thread? > I think the primary question the community needs to answer whether we > should join the Bahir or kick-off "Ignite Extensions" project? > > - > Denis > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 2:54 AM Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Maybe we could move all our Streaming Integrations there, but what is > about > > maintaining and committer permissions to the new repositories? > > I see the list of the committers and PMC members there > > https://bahir.apache.org/community-members/ > > > > Could somebody from Ignite community be added to this list as a > > PMC/committer to maintain Ignite integrations? > > If yes, I'd happy to join this project and collaborate with these guys > > together > > If no, and we should start from the zero level with external PRs - hmmm, > > it's better to have our own external repository with ApacheBahirr > ideology. > > > > Also, I agree, that all connectors could be moved there (in ApacheBahirr > > like repository), but not all modules from the page > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-IndependentIntegrations > > because > > they use different parts of core modules and could be developed with > > different velocity. > > > > In reality, before creation of new repositories we need wide discussion > > based on the document mentioned above. > > > > P.S. Of course, we could experiment in the next release 2.8 with one or > two > > integrations like twitter or ZeroMQ > > Also, I'd like Denis Magda idea for the separate repositories in Apache > > Github to maintain them by anybody. > > > > > > чт, 17 окт. 2019 г. в 05:02, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Hi Denis, Emmanouil > > > > > > Thank you for your email. I think creating a separate integration > project > > > in github and also proposing it as an apache incubator project will be > a > > > good move. The other separate integration modules > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-IndependentIntegrations > > > can > > > be moved to this new apache incubator project. > > > > > > There are similar integration available for Flink and Spark in Apache > > Bahir > > > https://bahir.apache.org/ > > > > > > Do you think we should reach out to Apache Bahir community with a > > proposal > > > or we should plan to create a separate Apache Incubator project? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Saikat > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:21 AM Emmanouil Gkatziouras < > > > gkatzio...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all! > > > > > > > > Based on the discussions most probably this is going to be on another > > > > GitHub repo. Therefore I will prepare a standalone project with the > > > Pub/Sub > > > > module and once the repository is created a pull request shall be > > issued. > > > > If there is anything else I can do in order to facilitate this please > > let > > > > me know. > > > > > > > > If a ticket is created for this issue, I shall be able to create a > pull > > > > request and thus a build will take place on ignite's CI. > > > > If everyone is aligned with adding a Pub/Sub implementation may I > > create > > > a > > > > ticket on JIRA? > > > > > > > > My next question has to do on how Ignite configures the build jobs in > > > Team > > > > City. The unit tests for my implementation need a local Pub/Sub > server > > up > > > > and running (they provide one for testing purposes). Will this take > > > effect > > > > in a form of a build script inside my implementation or is it > something > > > > that should be configured on Team City? > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Emmanouil > > > > > > > > > > > > *Emmanouil Gkatziouras* > > > > https://egkatzioura.com/ | > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/gkatziourasemmanouil/ > > > > https://github.com/gkatzioura > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 23:27, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Emmanouil, Saikat, > > > > > > > > > > After contemplating on this, let me propose another way with this > > > > > particular integration that is aligned with our modularization > > > endeavor. > > > > > The modularization [1] defines the Ignite core, Ignite modules, and > > > > > independent integrations. The first two are to be located in Ignite > > > > > repositories and to be tested/updated by the community for every > > > release. > > > > > The modules are a subset of existing integrations that are adopted > > > widely > > > > > and require community attention. > > > > > > > > > > As for the independent integrations [1], those are supposed to be > > > located > > > > > in a separate GitHub repo. I would advise us to start implementing > > this > > > > > concept with the Pub/Sub integration. Even though it will be > located > > > in a > > > > > separate Github repo, it will be listed among officially available > > > > > integrations on the Ignite website featuring Emmanouil as a > > > contributor. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-36%3A+Modularization#IEP-36:Modularization-IndependentIntegrations > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 9:47 PM Saikat Maitra < > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Emmanouil, > > > > > > > > > > > > The changes looks good to me. I wanted to check if you are also > > able > > > to > > > > > > validate that the once data is added to Ignite cluster you are > also > > > > able > > > > > to > > > > > > access it using another Ignite client or using rest endpoints. > > > > > > > > > > > > We use Teamcity for CI process, the details are as follows > > > > > > > > > > > > Trigger validation of those test suites that have been affected > by > > > your > > > > > > changes on TeamCity <http://ci.ignite.apache.org/>: < > > > > > http://204.14.53.153/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Locate a test suite you have to check, press button named > > "..." > > > > that > > > > > > is located on the left of "Run" button. "Run custom build" > > dialog > > > > will > > > > > > appear; > > > > > > - Go to "Changes" tab and choose > > "pull/<pull-request-number>/head" > > > > in > > > > > > "Build branch" dropdown list; > > > > > > - Press "Run build" button and monitor tests results. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Roman rsht...@yahoo.com - can you also please take a look? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Saikat > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 6:20 PM Emmanouil Gkatziouras < > > > > > > gkatzio...@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi @Saikat Maitra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have my implementation on an Ignite fork on my personal > GitHub > > > > > account > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > It is based on the Kafka implementation which is of a polling > > > nature. > > > > > > > GCP does not provide a service like Kafka. Instead it provides > us > > > > with > > > > > > > Pub/Sub which is just like Kafka. > > > > > > > Therefore using the Kafka streamer as a guideline made more > sense > > > to > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Apart from the implementation I have also added a unit test. > > > > > > > It definitely needs some polishing and a double check on my > side > > to > > > > > make > > > > > > > the review smooth. > > > > > > > For the tests a local Pub/Sub [2] server has to be setup > however > > I > > > am > > > > > not > > > > > > > sure which is the best way to do so with regards to your CI/CD. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/gkatzioura/ignite/tree/pubsub/modules/pubsub > > > > > > > [2] https://egkatzioura.com/2019/09/22/pub-sub-local-emulator/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Emmanouil Gkatziouras* > > > > > > > https://egkatzioura.com/ | > > > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/gkatziourasemmanouil/ > > > > > > > https://github.com/gkatzioura > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 02:11, Saikat Maitra < > > > saikat.mai...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Emmanouil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you please share more info about the implementation? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have similar implementation for data streamers with Kafka > > and > > > > > > RocketMQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/kafka-streamer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/rocketmq-streamer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please review and share if you have any questions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Saikat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 4:56 PM Emmanouil Gkatziouras < > > > > > > > > gkatzio...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > By mentioning Pub/Sub I mean Google Cloud's Pub/Sub [1] > > > > > > > > > Yes it is indeed cloud specific. It is the messaging > service > > > > > provided > > > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > GCP. > > > > > > > > > I have made the integration with it, but I haven't > published > > it > > > > yet > > > > > > (I > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > waiting for the discussion/ticket and proceed with the > > > > > contribution). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > Emmanouil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://cloud.google.com/pubsub/docs/overview > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Emmanouil Gkatziouras* > > > > > > > > > https://egkatzioura.com/ | > > > > > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/gkatziourasemmanouil/ > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/gkatzioura > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 21:45, Denis Magda < > dma...@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Emmanouil, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you referring to any specific implementation tailored > > > for a > > > > > > > cloud? > > > > > > > > If > > > > > > > > > > I'm not mistaken you were mentioning AWS/GCE. Is there > any > > > > Github > > > > > > > > source > > > > > > > > > > code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is a list of existing integrations with streaming > and > > > > > pub/sub > > > > > > > > > > frameworks: > > > > > > > > > > https://apacheignite-mix.readme.io/docs/overview > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with the source code in Ignite master: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/modules > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out those resources to see what are the most > suitable > > > > > Ignite > > > > > > > APIs > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > such integrations. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com> , @Roman < > > > > > > rsht...@yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , > > > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > > streaming technologies contributors/maintainers, could > you > > > > please > > > > > > > join > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > thread? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:58 AM Emmanouil Gkatziouras < > > > > > > > > > > gkatzio...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I started using Ignite lately. Part of my work involves > > > > > Pub/Sub, > > > > > > > > thus I > > > > > > > > > > > created a pub/sub streamer. > > > > > > > > > > > Pub/Sub is pretty close to Kafka. > > > > > > > > > > > Here's how the streamer works. Every node creates an > > > instance > > > > > of > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > Pub/Sub > > > > > > > > > > > client. > > > > > > > > > > > The clients subscribe to the same topic using the same > > > > > > subscription > > > > > > > > > name. > > > > > > > > > > > A message is being sent and one of the nodes will > receive > > > the > > > > > > > > message, > > > > > > > > > > > process it and then forward it to Ignite using the > > > extractor > > > > > > > > provided. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Emmanouil Gkatziouras* > > > > > > > > > > > https://egkatzioura.com/ | > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/gkatziourasemmanouil/ > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/gkatzioura > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
