Alexei, Many thanks for that article! Really nice that now we have a document describing Ignite approach for data consistency. I think it is super important because it is not trivial and very Ignite specific. I believe lots of Ignite developers will learn something new from this document.
By the way, I noticed a link to GridGain documentation [1]. Is it fine? [1] https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/developers-guide/key-value-api/transactions#pessimistic-transactions чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:49, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > Alex, > > Thanks a lot for putting your knowledge on paper. That's an invaluable > contribution! > > Looping in the user community (will be interesting for those who use native > persistence) and has just spread the word via Ignite twitter handle: > https://twitter.com/ApacheIgnite/status/1199837055007612928 > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alexei Scherbakov > <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Igniters, >> >> As a final action in my almost year long effort in repairing data >> consistency related issues for transactional persistent caches I've >> prepared an article explaining the principles of achieving the consistency >> between partition copies for these scenarios [1] >> Comments and suggestions are welcome. >> I plan to keep the article in actual state if something will change in this >> area in the future. >> Fixes were mostly done under IGNITE-10780 and several follow-up fixes. >> >> There is still work to be done. Currently I'm working on similar issue for >> atomic persistent caches [2]. I hope to give an update on that soon. >> >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Data+consistency >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11797 >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Alexei Scherbakov -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
