Alexei, > Ivan, the link is intentional.
Could you please elaborate why is it fine to have a such link? The referred document is out of community control. Do not we have a similar one in Ignite documentation? Should we discuss it in another mail thread? сб, 30 нояб. 2019 г. в 15:48, Alexei Scherbakov <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com>: > > Ivan, the link is intentional. > > Nikolai, the formatting looks ok to me. Feel free to change it however you > like. > > чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 09:53, Николай Ижиков <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > Hello, Alex. > > > > I think we should improve article formatting - code highlight, fonts, etc. > > > > For now, it’s very hard to read it. > > > > Can you, please, do it? > > > > > 28 нояб. 2019 г., в 09:25, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> > > написал(а): > > > > > > Alexei, > > > > > > Many thanks for that article! Really nice that now we have a document > > > describing Ignite approach for data consistency. I think it is super > > > important because it is not trivial and very Ignite specific. I > > > believe lots of Ignite developers will learn something new from this > > > document. > > > > > > By the way, I noticed a link to GridGain documentation [1]. Is it fine? > > > > > > [1] > > https://www.gridgain.com/docs/latest/developers-guide/key-value-api/transactions#pessimistic-transactions > > > > > > чт, 28 нояб. 2019 г. в 02:49, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >> Alex, > > >> > > >> Thanks a lot for putting your knowledge on paper. That's an invaluable > > contribution! > > >> > > >> Looping in the user community (will be interesting for those who use > > native persistence) and has just spread the word via Ignite twitter handle: > > >> https://twitter.com/ApacheIgnite/status/1199837055007612928 > > >> > > >> - > > >> Denis > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:29 AM Alexei Scherbakov < > > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Igniters, > > >>> > > >>> As a final action in my almost year long effort in repairing data > > >>> consistency related issues for transactional persistent caches I've > > >>> prepared an article explaining the principles of achieving the > > consistency > > >>> between partition copies for these scenarios [1] > > >>> Comments and suggestions are welcome. > > >>> I plan to keep the article in actual state if something will change in > > this > > >>> area in the future. > > >>> Fixes were mostly done under IGNITE-10780 and several follow-up fixes. > > >>> > > >>> There is still work to be done. Currently I'm working on similar issue > > for > > >>> atomic persistent caches [2]. I hope to give an update on that soon. > > >>> > > >>> [1] > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Data+consistency > > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11797 > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> Best regards, > > >>> Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Alexei Scherbakov -- Best regards, Ivan Pavlukhin
