Hi, Maxim.

I had not a chance to start working on it.
GG-17396 is about bitset implementation approach for out-of-order updates.
Doesn't seem high priority for me right now.

чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 20:24, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:

> Hello, Alexei,
>
>
> Do we have any updates on this issue [1] with replacing GG-XXXXX TODOs
> by Ignite analogues?
> Can you at least share an information about this issue - GG-17396? Is
> it still actual? Mentioned here [2].
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12422
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/PartitionUpdateCounter.java#L108
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 at 10:55, Alexei Scherbakov
> <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12422
> >
> > пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 10:27, Alexei Scherbakov <
> alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > Maxim,
> > >
> > > Yes, I think I could help.
> > >
> > > чт, 5 дек. 2019 г. в 19:52, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >> Alexey,
> > >>
> > >> Thank you so much! Can you help with the other issues?
> > >> It would be great to clean up them and enable checkstyle pattern for
> > >> such TODOs [1].
> > >>
> > >> Here is the full list of issues:
> > >>
> > >> GG-1075
> > >> GG-1314
> > >> GG-2311
> > >> GG-2329
> > >> GG-2852
> > >> GG-3946
> > >> GG-3997
> > >> GG-4368
> > >> GG-4440
> > >> GG-4911
> > >> GG-6460
> > >> GG-6879
> > >> GG-8123
> > >> GG-8768
> > >> GG-8884
> > >> GG-9141
> > >> GG-10884
> > >> GG-11141
> > >> GG-11148
> > >> GG-11220
> > >> GG-11241
> > >> GG-11480
> > >> GG-11640
> > >> GG-11768
> > >> GG-12292
> > >> GG-13223
> > >> GG-17396
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://checkstyle.sourceforge.io/config_misc.html#TodoComment
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 19:18, Alexei Scherbakov
> > >> <alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > This is a contribution artifact and was not done intentionally.
> > >> > I'll remove it in subsequent contributions.
> > >> >
> > >> > ср, 4 дек. 2019 г. в 16:57, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I agree that 'TODO: please, fix me GG-XXXXX' Should be definitely
> > >> avoided
> > >> > > in the code in all cases. A number of community members don't have
> > >> access
> > >> > > to these tickets.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > This is the same as linking to GG's private documentation or
> internal
> > >> > > network servers. It doesn't make sense.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ср, 4 дек. 2019 г. в 14:53, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Maxim,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > References to GG tickets have definitely no meaning for
> community.
> > >> But
> > >> > > > references to documentation on the other hand can be very
> useful,
> > >> > > > actually it is very similar to references to Wikipedia or
> > >> > > > aforementioned Oracle resources.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > ср, 4 дек. 2019 г. в 14:40, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org
> >:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Folks,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > In general case, 3rd party resource links look for me
> absolutely
> > >> > > > > normal e.g. we could have some links on Oracle's documentation
> > >> pages.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > But let's add a little accuracy. We are talking about links to
> > >> > > > > GridGain documentation pages. For me, it's the same as
> comments
> > >> `TODO:
> > >> > > > > please, fix me GG-XXXXX` in the source code (e.g. like this
> one
> > >> [1]).
> > >> > > > > Looks a bit strange :-)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > [1]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ignite/internal/processors/cache/PartitionUpdateCounter.java#L43
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 20:13, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> dpav...@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hi Igniters,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > It is not good if we'll made a tradition of linking to
> company
> > >> > > websites
> > >> > > > > > from the community website / wiki / lists. But if it makes
> > >> sense to
> > >> > > > mention
> > >> > > > > > something useful for users, why not.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > And in this particular case it may be ok, if it is relevant.
> > >> Just
> > >> > > > remember,
> > >> > > > > > community resources are not Nascar cars.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > See also https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/linking
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Sincerely,
> > >> > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > вт, 3 дек. 2019 г. в 19:50, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org
> >:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Hi Ivan,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > If an author of an article believes that there is a 3rd
> party
> > >> > > > resource that
> > >> > > > > > > is handy and helpful for his/her work then there is
> nothing
> > >> wrong
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > refer
> > >> > > > > > > to it. Based on Alexey's response in another thread, that
> > >> GridGain
> > >> > > > page
> > >> > > > > > > brings more clarity to the topic, thus, don't see any
> issue
> > >> with
> > >> > > > that.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > -
> > >> > > > > > > Denis
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:41 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > >> vololo...@gmail.com
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Folks,
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > In a thread about a document describing data consistency
> > >> [1] in
> > >> > > > Ignite
> > >> > > > > > > > it was identified that there is a link to GridGain
> > >> documentation.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I do not have strong arguments against having such
> links in
> > >> > > > community
> > >> > > > > > > > wiki. But it interesting to me to discuss the subject
> with
> > >> > > > community.
> > >> > > > > > > > Might be there is some common practice in ASF
> communities
> > >> about
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > subject.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Please, share your thoughts.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > [1]
> > >> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Data+consistency
> > >> > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > --
> > >> > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> >
> > >> > Best regards,
> > >> > Alexei Scherbakov
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alexei Scherbakov
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexei Scherbakov
>


-- 

Best regards,
Alexei Scherbakov

Reply via email to