Maxim, There are some of the tasks that are being moved from a release to a release or exist for a while and might be skipped for 2.8 if nobody is willing to document them. A could of examples of such tickets: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10331 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7704
How about preparing a list of the tickets that represent either a new functionality added in 2.8 (new metrics, service grid improvements, etc.) or change in behavior (it might be the case we need to update the baseline topology or rebalancing pages)? Once we get the list, we'll find the names of contributors and they will be able to cooperate with Artem who agreed to assist with this effort. The docs are needed before we announce the release and start bragging about new capabilities. - Denis On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 8:46 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > Denis, > > Actually, I've already filtered documentation issues previously and > left only major documentation tasks. Should I shrink the list more? > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 18:58, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Maxim, > > > > Thanks for the list. How many of those tickets relate to new capabilities > > or changed behavior in 2.8? You can probably come up with such a > sub-list. > > This filter returns all the documentation tickets we have in JIRA, and, > > indeed, many of them can be pushed to further releases. > > > > - > > Denis > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 3:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Denis, > > > > > > > > > We still need additional work over the whole documentation, not only > > > resolving comments for the new monitoring feature [2]. > > > Here is the full list of issues related to documentation - [1]. > > > > > > Examples need to be extended too. For instance, > > > - suspend/resume for pessimistic transactions > > > - default Ignite work dir location (changed in 2.7.6 right?) > > > - baseline auto-adjustment feature > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Unresolveddocumentationtasks > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12408 > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 00:48, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Maxim, > > > > > > > > Do you have any understanding in regards to documentation readiness? > I do > > > > remember Nikolay was creating a page for the new metrics framework > and > > > > Artem stepped in as a reviewer. But not sure if that supposedly the > > > largest > > > > item is completed and if the other pages need to be updated. > > > > > > > > - > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Current the 2.8 release status > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. The PR with RELEASE_NOTES fully updated [1]. > > > > > > > > > > 2. Previously mentioned performance drop has not been confirmed. > Run > > > > > many times in different environments. All test results within the > > > > > margin of error. > > > > > In-memory, putAll, 4 nodes, 1 client > > > > > IgnitePutAllBenchmark: +1% > > > > > IgnitePutAllTxBenchmark: -6% > > > > > > > > > > 3. Waiting for the vote completion > > > > > (Allow or prohibit a joint use of @deprecated and > @IgniteExperimental) > > > > > > > > > > 4. Mark MVCC with IgniteExperimental [2]. > > > > > > > > > > 5. Wait for ML examples to be fixed [3]. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7367/files > > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Mark-MVCC-with-IgniteExperimental-td45669.html > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12657 > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 15:08, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to add one more fix to the release: [1] > > > > > > It adds versioning to internal classes of distributed metastorage > > > > > component. > > > > > > Without this fix it would be much harder to update these classes > > > without > > > > > > breaking binary compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12638 > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 22:33, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ivan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should not we state in release notes what new experimental > API > > > was > > > > > added? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should. Will do. > > > > > > > Just not to miss anything that we should mark with > > > > > > > @IgniteExperimental: Consistency Check [1], Monitoring [2] > anything > > > > > > > else? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Flink integration was moved to external repository how > Ignite > > > 2.8 > > > > > > > users will be able to use that integration? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since ignite-extension has a separate release cycle (right?), > it is > > > > > > > better to release ignite-extension rather than cherry-pick this > > > change > > > > > > > back to 2.8. I also think it is not a blocker for the release, > but > > > we > > > > > > > should do our best make the first ignite-extension release as > > > earlier > > > > > > > as possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10663 > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11848 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 22:07, Ivan Pavlukhin < > vololo...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maxim, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A couple of questions: > > > > > > > > 1. We added an annotation to designate experimental API. > Should > > > not > > > > > we > > > > > > > > state in release notes what new experimental API was added? > > > Perhaps > > > > > in > > > > > > > > a separate block. > > > > > > > > 2. As Flink integration was moved to external repository how > > > Ignite > > > > > > > > 2.8 users will be able to use that integration? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 5 февр. 2020 г. в 21:21, Maxim Muzafarov < > mmu...@apache.org > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've prepared RELEASE_NOTES pull-request [1] to the 2.8 > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently, IEP-35 monitoring issues are not included in > this > > > PR. > > > > > Will > > > > > > > > > do it soon. > > > > > > > > > Please, take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7367/files > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 14:38, Maxim Muzafarov < > > > mmu...@apache.org> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me share the current status of the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. > > > > > > > > > > Waiting for the issues [1] [2] (discussed previously this > > > > > thread) to > > > > > > > > > > be tested by TC.Bot and merged to the 2.8 release branch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. > > > > > > > > > > Only 2 release BLOCKER issues left. I'm planning to move > > > these > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > > to 2.8.1 release. > > > > > > > > > > The issue [4] (Error during purges by expiration: Unknown > > > page > > > > > type) > > > > > > > > > > will be covered by [1] [2]. > > > > > > > > > > The issue [3] (Apache Ignite Cluster(Amazon S3 Based > > > Discovery) > > > > > Nodes > > > > > > > > > > getting down) probably require additional info to > reproduce > > > the > > > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. > > > > > > > > > > A potential performance drop on `putAll` operations on an > > > > > in-memory > > > > > > > > > > cluster (see [5] for details). > > > > > > > > > > I'll try to reproduce in another test environment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will keep you posted. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12593 > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12594 > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12398 > > > > > > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12489 > > > > > > > > > > [5] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8#ApacheIgnite2.8-Benchmarks(LATEST) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 15:02, Alexey Goncharuk > > > > > > > > > > <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good, will do! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Sincerely yours, > > > > > > Ivan Bessonov > > > > > > > > >
