> As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private PMC list
Cannot understand why it should be discussed on a private list. What
is the clue?

Best regards,
Ivan Pavlukhin

сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 16:00, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
>
> As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a private PMC
> list
>
> сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 15:12 Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > As far as my understanding goes, ignite-zookeeper is listed for removal
> > because it brings a lot of dependencies, some of which may have known
> > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also considered
> > vulnerable by some scanners.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Ilya Kasnacheev
> >
> >
> > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could be form by
> > > voting on user-list
> > >
> > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > > Nikolay, Alexey,
> > > >
> > > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker image was
> > discussed
> > > > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about removing these
> > > > modules from the product. The idea was to create an additional
> > > distribution
> > > > which is much lighter than the current full package to reduce the size
> > of
> > > > the downloadable artifact and reduce the number of potential
> > > > vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
> > > >
> > > > The list of modules was chosen subjectively by the number of questions
> > on
> > > > the user-list, number third-party libraries (size) and vulnerabilities
> > > the
> > > > module brings. Given that there are still questions, we are definitely
> > > not
> > > > ready to release it in 2.8.0.
> > > >
> > > > Let's move discussion to the original thread?
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Slim-binary-release-and-docker-image-for-Apache-Ignite-td45110.html
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to