Ilya,

Thanks for catching that and sharing. I wonder if there are any other
blockers that were pushed to 2.8.x version. If there are a few then we can
produce 2.8.1 shortly, otherwise, it sounds reasonable to me to fix the
issue with putAll, update the binaries and finish the process.

-
Denis


On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:34 PM Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I have filed an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12746
>
> I think this is potentially a game breaker and makes me recommend avoiding
> 2.8, if we release it without fix (for now).
>
> If you are using any partitioned caches, anyway.
>
> So I suggest we withhold 2.8.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Ilya Kasnacheev
>
>
> вт, 3 мар. 2020 г. в 20:53, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
>
> > Ilya,
> >
> > I do not want to force the release no matter what happens, but I think
> > we should release what we have to get feedback not just from the
> > developer community but from our users too.
> >
> > And fix all these issues in 2.8.1.
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 20:33, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Can we please hold back publishing AI-2.8.0-rc1 as public Apache Ignite
> > 2.8
> > > release?
> > >
> > > I have just been notified that
> > >
> >
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedColocated
> > >
> >
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridCacheColocatedDebugTest#testPutsMultithreadedMixed
> > > are flaky: they seem to deadlock on putAll sorted keys maps. They used
> to
> > > pass solidly on 2.7, but fail on master and ignite-2.8.
> > >
> > > (They fail around 1 time out of 10, so just run them 25 times to check)
> > >
> > > If there is indeed a deadlock, this would become a blocker to this
> > release,
> > > in my opinion, but I need some time to check.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > --
> > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >
> > >
> > > вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 11:29, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Ivan,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree with you that the more members will check the release the
> > > > better will be. That's why I've shared the release candidate links
> [1]
> > > > before starting a vote. The best time for starting a vote is not
> > > > mentioned at our release wiki page [2] (should we?) and I've also
> > > > failed with googling the best practices for it too. So, I've supposed
> > > > since all of us are working on their own tasks during weekdays the
> > > > free time on the weekend is the best choice for cheking\voting on the
> > > > release. Probably this decision was wrong.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-8-RELEASE-Time-Scope-Manager-tp43616p46117.html
> > > > [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Release+Process
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 00:37, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Also I have a comment regarding to voting. Voting for 72 hour
> > spanning
> > > > > a weekend sounds a little bit odd to me. In a particular case the
> > more
> > > > > people check the release the better. And I suppose there is more
> time
> > > > > for it on weekdays for the majority.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > > >
> > > > > вс, 1 мар. 2020 г. в 00:33, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a
> > private
> > > > PMC list
> > > > > > Cannot understand why it should be discussed on a private list.
> > What
> > > > > > is the clue?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 16:00, Alexey Zinoviev <
> > zaleslaw....@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As I remember, that Pavlov suggested to discuss threats on a
> > private
> > > > PMC
> > > > > > > list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 15:12 Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > > > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As far as my understanding goes, ignite-zookeeper is listed
> for
> > > > removal
> > > > > > > > because it brings a lot of dependencies, some of which may
> have
> > > > known
> > > > > > > > vulnerabilities, which will make the distribution also
> > considered
> > > > > > > > vulnerable by some scanners.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Ilya Kasnacheev
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г. в 14:18, Alexey Zinoviev <
> > > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ok, lets move to this thread. Also, the slim release could
> be
> > > > form by
> > > > > > > > > voting on user-list
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > сб, 29 февр. 2020 г., 9:55 Alexey Goncharuk <
> > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > >:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Nikolay, Alexey,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > First, the idea of the slim binary release and docker
> > image was
> > > > > > > > discussed
> > > > > > > > > > openly on the dev-list [1]. Second, nobody talks about
> > > > removing these
> > > > > > > > > > modules from the product. The idea was to create an
> > additional
> > > > > > > > > distribution
> > > > > > > > > > which is much lighter than the current full package to
> > reduce
> > > > the size
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > the downloadable artifact and reduce the number of
> > potential
> > > > > > > > > > vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The list of modules was chosen subjectively by the number
> > of
> > > > questions
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > the user-list, number third-party libraries (size) and
> > > > vulnerabilities
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > module brings. Given that there are still questions, we
> are
> > > > definitely
> > > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > ready to release it in 2.8.0.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Let's move discussion to the original thread?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Slim-binary-release-and-docker-image-for-Apache-Ignite-td45110.html
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to