Nikolay,

I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.

вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com>:

> Hello, Igniters,
>
> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics
> improvement" - it depends
> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed probably.
>
> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should probably ask
> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> those changes.
>
> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok with it?
>
> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hello, Igniters.
> >
> > I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1 release.
> >
> > TC bot results -
> >
> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >
> > I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >
> > - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> > GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> > - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT (#7649)
> > - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or
> > full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> > - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted partition - Fixes
> > #7494.
> > - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics improvement
> >
> > Denis Garus,
> > Taras Ledkov,
> > Alexey Plekhanov,
> > Ivan Bessonov,
> >
> > Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your contribution in
> > ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >
> > CHERRY PICKED:
> >
> > + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log method
> which
> > must not be used in production code (#7604)
> > + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails BatchUpdateException
> > if function is used (#7615)
> > + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory restore
> > is in progress. Fixes #7562
> > + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with failed
> > deployment. (#7620)
> > + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. (#7606)
> > + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the
> Timestamp
> > and Guid params. (#7618)
> > + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in MetricRegistryMBean
> > removed. (#7549)
> > + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception - Fixes
> > #7516.
> > + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> > + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread shutdown on
> > client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522.
> > + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on cache#putAllAsync -
> > Fixes #7483.
> > + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes #7469.
> > + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE command
> > (#7321)
> > + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for system
> > types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> > + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can prevent
> > late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> > + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology caused by
> > partition reservation (#7251)
> > + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult close.
> > + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. - Fixes
> > #7411.
> > + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value before
> > clearing a partition (#7341)
> > + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> > GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of eviction
> > callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> > + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy cause
> > failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> > + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in
> > marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> > + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException
> during
> > IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> > + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one -
> > Fixes #7379.
> > + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of arrays,
> > collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> > + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server event
> > can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> > + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> > ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> > + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545 Introduce
> > listener interface for components to react to partition map exchange
> events
> > + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for atomic
> > and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> > + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache destroy. -
> > Fixes #7298.
> > + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when non-indexed
> > columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> > + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a BinaryObject's
> > field - Fixes #7292.
> > + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479 Make binary
> > metadata be registered only once per type creation
> > + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by consistent ID
> > - Fixes #7151.
> > + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't work
> > with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> > + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near node
> > left. - Fixes #7274.
> > + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes switch
> > their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - Fixes
> #7273.
> > + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix failed
> > compilation due to concurrent merge
> > + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted then
> > owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> > + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> > + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and indexes
> > when cache operation is interrupted.
> > + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> > PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> > + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps generation on
> > system failure.
> > + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation optimized.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov....@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >
> > > Hello, Igniters.
> > >
> > > After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to transfer
> > from master to 2.8.1
> > > It will be very helpful if someone double check my results.
> > >
> > > I did the following:
> > >
> > > 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
> > > 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> > >
> > >       git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8 upstream-http/master
> > >       git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> > 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> > >
> > > 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the dirty python
> > script:
> > >
> > > ```
> > > tickets = set()
> > > founded = {}
> > > with open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> > file_in:
> > >    for line in file_in:
> > >        if not line.startswith('-'):
> > >            ticket = line[:-1]
> > >            tickets.add(ticket)
> > >            founded[ticket] = 0
> > > print(tickets)
> > >
> > > with
> > open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> as
> > file_in:
> > >    for commit_msg in file_in:
> > >        for ticket in tickets:
> > >            if ticket in commit_msg:
> > >                print(commit_msg)
> > >                founded[ticket] += 1
> > >
> > > for ticket in founded.keys():
> > >    if founded[ticket] != 1:
> > >        print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> > > ```
> > >
> > > Results:
> > >
> > >
> > >    TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> > > 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> > GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> > > a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and
> > ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> > > d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log method
> which
> > must not be used in production code (#7604)
> > > 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails BatchUpdateException
> > if function is used (#7615)
> > > 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT (#7649)
> > > b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory restore
> > is in progress. Fixes #7562
> > > f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with failed
> > deployment. (#7620)
> > > 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. (#7606)
> > > 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the
> Timestamp
> > and Guid params. (#7618)
> > > 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in MetricRegistryMBean
> > removed. (#7549)
> > > 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed or
> > full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> > > 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception - Fixes
> > #7516.
> > > 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> > > bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted partition - Fixes
> > #7494.
> > > ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread shutdown on
> > client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522.
> > > 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented. (#7495)
> > > e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on cache#putAllAsync -
> > Fixes #7483.
> > > 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in CLI and REST.
> > (#7471)
> > > 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics improvement
> > > e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring (#7474)
> > > 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes #7469.
> > > f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE command
> > (#7321)
> > > 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for system
> > types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> > > cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can prevent
> > late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> > > 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology caused by
> > partition reservation (#7251)
> > > 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult close.
> > > 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. - Fixes
> > #7411.
> > > 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value before
> > clearing a partition (#7341)
> > > e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> > GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of eviction
> > callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> > > bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy cause
> > failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> > > 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in
> > marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> > > 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException
> during
> > IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> > > 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one -
> > Fixes #7379.
> > > 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of arrays,
> > collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> > > 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server event
> > can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> > > e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> > ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> > > a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for atomic
> > and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> > > e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache destroy. -
> > Fixes #7298.
> > > 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when non-indexed
> > columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> > > e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a BinaryObject's
> > field - Fixes #7292.
> > > 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by consistent ID
> > - Fixes #7151.
> > > 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't work
> > with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> > > b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near node
> > left. - Fixes #7274.
> > > 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes switch
> > their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - Fixes
> #7273.
> > > 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted then
> > owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> > > 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> > IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> > > b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and indexes
> > when cache operation is interrupted.
> > > 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> > PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> > > 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps generation on
> > system failure.
> > > c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation optimized.
> > >
> > >    ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> > > 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started in 'prefer
> > IPv4' mode.
> > > bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED cache during
> > rebalance (#7277)
> > > 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after
> > deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> > > 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> > > ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties - Fixes
> > #7505.
> > > 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case statements
> > in Spring Data.
> > > 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show histogram
> > values in case when histogram name contains underscore character (#7542)
> > > 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> > putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> > >
> > >
> > >    CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> > > IGNITE-12775 = 0
> > > IGNITE-7414 = 0
> > > IGNITE-10477 = 0
> > > IGNITE-8625 = 0
> > > IGNITE-11862 = 0
> > > IGNITE-10313 = 0
> > > IGNITE-10011 = 0
> > > IGNITE-12767 = 0
> > >
> > >
> > >> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> > написал(а):
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available then and
> > leave a
> > >> comment.
> > >>
> > >> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the release
> branch.
> > >>
> > >> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> > >>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for 2.8.1 to
> avoid
> > >>> conflicts.
> > >>>
> > >>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> > >>> написал(а):
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Nikolay,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to master, do
> > you
> > >>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself or should I
> > >>> merge
> > >>>> it to the release branch?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Great!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org
> >:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I am.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> > >>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I suppose it is
> > >>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the current thread
> > subject
> > >>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a manager for
> > >>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> nizhi...@apache.org
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who is a release
> > >>>>> manager?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> > >>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> > >>> vololo...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not we reflect
> on
> > >>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > nizhi...@apache.org
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to 2.8.1 scope
> > [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> > plehanov.a...@gmail.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following bug-fixes too,
> > which
> > >>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause node failure
> > >>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with deserialization
> of
> > >>> some
> > >>>>>>>>>> types on
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used (IGNITE-12624
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on client
> close
> > >>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents main() method
> > from
> > >>>>>>>>>> exiting
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint read lock,
> > which
> > >>> I
> > >>>>>>>>>> propose
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix brings
> > >>> significant
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large number of
> CPUs
> > >>>>> (there
> > >>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in 2.8.0 for all
> > >>>>>>>>>> transactional
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
> > mmu...@apache.org
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker issues in
> minor
> > >>>>> bug-fix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we should
> release
> > >>> all
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the next 2.8.2
> > >>>>> release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor releases.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > >>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for the tickets
> > with
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding release branch.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release and exclude
> > >>> tickets
> > >>>>>>>>>> that is
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a blocker issues.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> > >>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805 "NullPointerException
> > on
> > >>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native persistence
> > are
> > >>>>> used"
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> > >>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> macrerg...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> (fix
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <
> > >>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release 2.8.1 branch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 open PRs
> > in
> > >>>>> master
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <
> > >>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release manager of
> > 2.8.1
> > >>>>> Apache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of committers, PMCs
> > >>>>> expressed
> > >>>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can close this
> > >>>>> question
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, can you
> > please
> > >>>>> help
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under TC.Bot
> > [1]?
> > >>>>> We
> > >>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the release branch
> > as
> > >>>>> early
> > >>>>>>>>>> as
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov <
> > >>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL query
> > >>>>> execution
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 contains
> > serious
> > >>>>> SQL
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not thread-safe.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. JDBC
> thin
> > >>>>> client
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries from JDBC
> > thin,
> > >>>>> etc.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already keep
> > >>> adding
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on the release
> > time
> > >>>>> frames
> > >>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is the time
> > proposed
> > >>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a schedule:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody who
> ready
> > to
> > >>>>> drive
> > >>>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey Antonov <
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 Transaction
> > hangs
> > >>>>> after
> > >>>>>>>>>> too
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim Muzafarov <
> > >>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under TC.Bot
> > >>>>> protection
> > >>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey Goncharuk
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits to master
> > since
> > >>>>> 2.8
> > >>>>>>>>>> branch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion are
> worth
> > >>>>>>>>>> including
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are ready end the
> > >>>>> effort of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as there are
> no
> > >>>>> implicit
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your opinion on
> > >>>>> whether we
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing on
> Ignite
> > >>>>> client
> > >>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's states can
> > stuck
> > >>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable topology
> > caused
> > >>>>> by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on MapResult
> > close.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance can
> start
> > on
> > >>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>> cleared
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and then
> > joins
> > >>>>> back.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction callbacks
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type
> > in
> > >>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> > >>> NullPointerException
> > >>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> > historical
> > >>>>> one
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last
> > >>> server
> > >>>>>>>>>> event
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for atomic
> and
> > >>>>> mixed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which is not
> > only
> > >>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
> > >>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> > >>>>> BinaryObject's
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> > >>>>> consistent
> > >>>>>>>>>> ID
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL
> > >>>>> doesn't
> > >>>>>>>>>> work
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during recovery
> on
> > >>>>> near
> > >>>>>>>>>> node
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other
> > nodes
> > >>>>> switch
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node join.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is
> > >>>>> evicted
> > >>>>>>>>>> then
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache data
> and
> > >>>>> indexes
> > >>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference output in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated thread dumps
> > in
> > >>>>> failure
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by expiration:
> > >>>>> Unknown
> > >>>>>>>>>> page
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Ivan Bessonov
>

Reply via email to