Hello, Nikolay.

This has been fixed by increasing the test timeout in IGNITE-12683 [1][2].

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12683
[2] 
https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/bf394a77e1de6432e493eb2818243a82b577f11e

вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 18:28, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
>
> Hello, Igniters.
>
> While cherry-picking to 2.8.1 I found flaky test regarding BPlusTree [1], [2]
>
> All failures of this tests relates to PR’s based on 2.8.
> It seems we hav fix in master but doesn’t have it in 2.8 and 2.8.1
>
> Can someone suggest, what commit fixes this tests?
>
> [1] 
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-7895536196794411367&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>
> [2] 
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=IgniteTests24Java8&buildTypeId=&tab=testDetails&testNameId=-3485591522651012009&order=TEST_STATUS_DESC&branch_IgniteTests24Java8=__all_branches__&itemsCount=50
>
>
> > 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:49, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com> написал(а):
> >
> > Sure, here's PR with 3 cherry-picked commits that I mentioned:
> > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7708
> >
> > вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >
> >> OK then, let’s include it in the 2.8.1
> >>
> >> Ivan, can you, please, prepare PR in the ignite-2.8.1 branch that contain
> >> cherry-pick for all required commits?
> >>
> >>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 17:01, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> написал(а):
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>
> >>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix release.
> >>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>
> >>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>
> >>> Mainly IGNITE-12756 brings some improvements related with TCP
> >>> communication metrics (performance, memory footprint, IgniteSpiContext
> >>> improved in order to provide ability to implement metrics related
> >>> SPI's without using internal API's, code improvements)
> >>>
> >>> But! It also fixes potential NPE's which can be thrown on node start.
> >>> So it would be great to include this fix to 2.8.1 release.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> >> metrics
> >>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed probably.
> >>>>
> >>>> IGNITE-12735 - Metric exporter implementation could lead to
> >> NullPointerException from gauge which invoke communication
> >>>> IGNITE-12568 - MessageFactory implementations refactoring
> >>>>
> >>>> Ivan,
> >>>> Personally, I’m against any refactoring improvements in bug fix release.
> >>>> So, I propose to exclude IGNITE-12756 from 2.8.1
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrey, what do you think as a committer of this improvements?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> 21 апр. 2020 г., в 10:44, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>
> >> написал(а):
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've cherry-picked IGNITE-12734 to 2.8.1 branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> вт, 21 апр. 2020 г. в 10:02, Ivan Bessonov <bessonov...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hello, Igniters,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> considering commit "683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI
> >> metrics
> >>>>>> improvement" - it depends
> >>>>>> on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12735 and
> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12568,
> >>>>>> both were targeted to 2.9, but this has to be changed probably.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There might be other issues that I didn't find, we should probably ask
> >>>>>> Andrey Gura about it, he is the author of
> >>>>>> those changes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, release scope should be expanded a little bit, are you ok with it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> пн, 20 апр. 2020 г. в 19:24, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I perform cherry-pick for most commits targeted for 2.8.1 release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> TC bot results -
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://mtcga.gridgain.com/pr.html?serverId=apache&suiteId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll&branchForTc=pull%2F7690%2Fhead&action=Latest&baseBranchForTc=pull%2F7102%2Fhead
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I need help with cherry picking the following commits:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>> - 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT (#7649)
> >>>>>>> - 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed
> >> or
> >>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>> - bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted partition -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>> - 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics improvement
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Denis Garus,
> >>>>>>> Taras Ledkov,
> >>>>>>> Alexey Plekhanov,
> >>>>>>> Ivan Bessonov,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Can you help me with above commits and cherry-pick your contribution
> >> in
> >>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 branch?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> CHERRY PICKED:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> + d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log method
> >>>>>> which
> >>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>> + 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>> + b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory
> >> restore
> >>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>> + f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with
> >> failed
> >>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>> + 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. (#7606)
> >>>>>>> + 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the
> >>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>> + 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in
> >> MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>> + 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>> + 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>> + ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread shutdown on
> >>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522.
> >>>>>>> + e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>> + 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes #7469.
> >>>>>>> + f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE
> >> command
> >>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>> + 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for
> >> system
> >>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>> + cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can
> >> prevent
> >>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>> + 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology
> >> caused by
> >>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>> + 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult
> >> close.
> >>>>>>> + 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>> + 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value before
> >>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>> + e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of eviction
> >>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>> + bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy
> >> cause
> >>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>> + 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in
> >>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>> + 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException
> >>>>>> during
> >>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>> + 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one
> >> -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>> + 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of
> >> arrays,
> >>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>> + 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server
> >> event
> >>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>> + e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>> + cebc76f1f5d7d077093ddaecbabcd8db2106c60a - IGNITE-12545 Introduce
> >>>>>>> listener interface for components to react to partition map exchange
> >>>>>> events
> >>>>>>> + a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for
> >> atomic
> >>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>> + e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
> >> destroy. -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>> + 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
> >> non-indexed
> >>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>> + e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>> + 66593af03aeac37d0e76b6c010e8386f6f0c36c7 - IGNITE-12479 Make binary
> >>>>>>> metadata be registered only once per type creation
> >>>>>>> + 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >> consistent ID
> >>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>> + 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't
> >> work
> >>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>> + b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near
> >> node
> >>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>> + 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes
> >> switch
> >>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - Fixes
> >>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>> + 5bd385935bcba9a1cc271497d1818e9bb4f0318a IGNITE-12227 Fix failed
> >>>>>>> compilation due to concurrent merge
> >>>>>>> + 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted
> >> then
> >>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>> + 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>> + b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and
> >> indexes
> >>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>> + 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>> + 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >> generation on
> >>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>> + c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation optimized.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 18 апр. 2020 г., в 18:59, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhikov....@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> After some scripting I got the following lists of commits to
> >> transfer
> >>>>>>> from master to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>> It will be very helpful if someone double check my results.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I did the following:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. Export all resolved tickets targeted to 2.8.1 from Mira
> >>>>>>>> 2. Found commit difference between 2.8.0 and master
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>    git merge-base upstream-http/ignite-2.8 upstream-http/master
> >>>>>>>>    git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit
> >>>>>>> 9265c04a368c4cf0fc331aac5a71f7d0db365ea8..HEAD
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 3. Filter commits to transfer preserving order with the dirty python
> >>>>>>> script:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>> tickets = set()
> >>>>>>>> founded = {}
> >>>>>>>> with open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/resolved.csv") as
> >>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>> for line in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>     if not line.startswith('-'):
> >>>>>>>>         ticket = line[:-1]
> >>>>>>>>         tickets.add(ticket)
> >>>>>>>>         founded[ticket] = 0
> >>>>>>>> print(tickets)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>
> >> open("/Users/sbt-izhikov-nv/src/ignite-2.8.1/commits-after-cut-2.8.txt")
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>> file_in:
> >>>>>>>> for commit_msg in file_in:
> >>>>>>>>     for ticket in tickets:
> >>>>>>>>         if ticket in commit_msg:
> >>>>>>>>             print(commit_msg)
> >>>>>>>>             founded[ticket] += 1
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> for ticket in founded.keys():
> >>>>>>>> if founded[ticket] != 1:
> >>>>>>>>     print(ticket + " = " + str(founded[ticket]))
> >>>>>>>> ```
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Results:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> TO CHERRY PICK (FROM BOTTOM TO TOP):
> >>>>>>>> 4e6cd2ce04 IGNITE-12759 Getting a SecurityContext from
> >>>>>>> GridSecurityProcessor - Fixes #7523.
> >>>>>>>> a65e51c914 IGNITE-12790 Introduce distributed SQL configuration and
> >>>>>>> ability to disable SQL functions. (#7593)
> >>>>>>>> d0c155fe43 IGNITE-12772 Fixed JmxMetricExporterSpi uses log method
> >>>>>> which
> >>>>>>> must not be used in production code (#7604)
> >>>>>>>> 00cb1ad7a3 IGNITE-12764: Thin JDBC streaming fails
> >> BatchUpdateException
> >>>>>>> if function is used (#7615)
> >>>>>>>> 60ebc23f99 IGNITE-12848 fix H2Connection leaks on INSERT (#7649)
> >>>>>>>> b8167296b1 IGNITE-12805 Fixed NullPointerException when memory
> >> restore
> >>>>>>> is in progress. Fixes #7562
> >>>>>>>> f57509e8e6 IGNITE-12828 Fixes NPE during CQ registration with failed
> >>>>>>> deployment. (#7620)
> >>>>>>>> 826aad8890 IGNITE-12726 Long keys support for metastorage. (#7606)
> >>>>>>>> 2b1d2b4dec IGNITE-12859: Support of .Net service call with the
> >>>>>> Timestamp
> >>>>>>> and Guid params. (#7618)
> >>>>>>>> 6f3515686f IGNITE-12769: histogramNames cache in MetricRegistryMBean
> >>>>>>> removed. (#7549)
> >>>>>>>> 0b185b192f IGNITE-12800  SQL: local queries cursors must be closed
> >> or
> >>>>>>> full read to unlock the GridH2Table. (#7551)
> >>>>>>>> 795617fc94 IGNITE-12774 Handle "Too many open files" exception -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7516.
> >>>>>>>> 3928bb3a13 IGNITE-12799 Fixed wrong SpEL expression.
> >>>>>>>> bcaae8deef IGNITE-12734 Fixed scan query over evicted partition -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7494.
> >>>>>>>> ef4f67e351 IGNITE-12743 Java thin client: Fixed thread shutdown on
> >>>>>>> client close when partition awareness is enabled - Fixes #7522.
> >>>>>>>> 13637a2dfe IGNITE-12745: Compute job view implemented. (#7495)
> >>>>>>>> e389bb8f55 IGNITE-12728 Collect time statistics on
> >> cache#putAllAsync -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7483.
> >>>>>>>> 4921fcf1fe IGNITE-12701 : Disallow silent deactivation in CLI and
> >> REST.
> >>>>>>> (#7471)
> >>>>>>>> 683f22e64f IGNITE-12756 TcpCommunication SPI metrics improvement
> >>>>>>>> e4f9be52f8 IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring (#7474)
> >>>>>>>> 90951c6b2e IGNITE-12711 Fixed tests memory usage. - Fixes #7469.
> >>>>>>>> f32b44deb1 IGNITE-12590: Fix (remove) check KEY at the MERGE command
> >>>>>>> (#7321)
> >>>>>>>> 59917f0731 IGNITE-12624 Java thin client: typeId generation for
> >> system
> >>>>>>> types fixed - Fixes #7416.
> >>>>>>>> cc6f4d7814 IGNITE-12671 Ignoring single messages during PME can
> >> prevent
> >>>>>>> late affinity switch. - Fixes #7425.
> >>>>>>>> 02ac292662 IGNITE-11798 Fix memory leak on unstable topology caused
> >> by
> >>>>>>> partition reservation (#7251)
> >>>>>>>> 8ed8576544 IGNITE-12665: SQL: Fix potential race on MapResult close.
> >>>>>>>> 465cc444d0 IGNITE-12582 Add Spring EL support in Spring Data. -
> >> Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7411.
> >>>>>>>> 100101ccce IGNITE-12605: Reset initial update counter value before
> >>>>>>> clearing a partition (#7341)
> >>>>>>>> e17887bfbf IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl may accumulate a huge number of eviction
> >>>>>>> callbacks - Fixes #7399.
> >>>>>>>> bdbe6a79d0 IGNITE-12651 Non-comparable keys for eviction policy
> >> cause
> >>>>>>> failure handle and node shutdown - Fixes #7397.
> >>>>>>>> 56a515db6d IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record type in
> >>>>>>> marshalled mode during iteration - Fixes #7371.
> >>>>>>>> 14dd160f90 IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause NullPointerException
> >>>>>> during
> >>>>>>> IO message processing if security is enabled - Fixes #7366.
> >>>>>>>> 67ac1d5d68 IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a historical one -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7379.
> >>>>>>>> 4433485d74 IGNTIE-12468 Java thin client: deserialization of arrays,
> >>>>>>> collections and maps fixed - Fixes #7320.
> >>>>>>>> 0dfd98388e IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of last server
> >> event
> >>>>>>> can be wiped from history - Fixes #7359.
> >>>>>>>> e2c597fff1 IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown by
> >>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager during cache creation - Fixes #7335.
> >>>>>>>> a9278eedf7 IGNITE-11797 Fixed partition consistency issues for
> >> atomic
> >>>>>>> and mixed tx-atomic cache groups. - Fixes #7315.
> >>>>>>>> e160c8f231 IGNITE-12557 Fix possible IgniteOOM during cache
> >> destroy. -
> >>>>>>> Fixes #7298.
> >>>>>>>> 41ed3294ec IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state when
> >> non-indexed
> >>>>>>> columns are dropped - Fixes #7290.
> >>>>>>>> e89c71d3cb IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>> field - Fixes #7292.
> >>>>>>>> 6668d86ad4 IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node by
> >> consistent ID
> >>>>>>> - Fixes #7151.
> >>>>>>>> 214044ae2e IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in WAL doesn't
> >> work
> >>>>>>> with segment compaction - Fixes #7148.
> >>>>>>>> b677b36cc4 IGNITE-12548 Fixed tx desync during recovery on near node
> >>>>>>> left. - Fixes #7274.
> >>>>>>>> 223281be93 IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by other nodes
> >> switch
> >>>>>>> their state to MOVING due to counter difference on node join. - Fixes
> >>>>>> #7273.
> >>>>>>>> 5e95f65bbc IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition is evicted
> >> then
> >>>>>>> owned again and historically rebalanced. - Fixes #7270.
> >>>>>>>> 1fbc284fd0 IGNITE-12101 Fixed NullPointerException when
> >>>>>>> IgniteQueue.removeAll is called. - Fixes #7266.
> >>>>>>>> b9bab88cbb IGNITE-12536: Inconsistency between cache data and
> >> indexes
> >>>>>>> when cache operation is interrupted.
> >>>>>>>> 50f8f8c5be IGNITE-12403 Throttle output of bytes in
> >>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker/tests - Fixes #7086.
> >>>>>>>> 594061d906 IGNITE-12523 Added throttling for thread dumps
> >> generation on
> >>>>>>> system failure.
> >>>>>>>> c97b08e672 IGNITE-12491 Dirty pages count calculation optimized.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ALREADY IN 2.8.1:
> >>>>>>>> 1b51981c43 IGNITE-8343 Skip IPv6 address if node is started in
> >> 'prefer
> >>>>>>> IPv4' mode.
> >>>>>>>> bd67b31819 IGNITE-12549 Fix query mapping on REPLICATED cache during
> >>>>>>> rebalance (#7277)
> >>>>>>>> 87a7c4de90 IGNITE-12863 Initialize PojoField accessor after
> >>>>>>> deserialization - Fixes #7624.
> >>>>>>>> 1f34def836 IGNITE-12860 .NET: Fix NRE in BinaryStructure.GetFieldId
> >>>>>>>> ad6759f955 IGNITE-12757 Visor CMD: Fixed invalid properties - Fixes
> >>>>>>> #7505.
> >>>>>>>> 5100ec3e5c IGNITE-12672 Fix incorrect parsing of lower-case
> >> statements
> >>>>>>> in Spring Data.
> >>>>>>>> 6a81a7d6db IGNITE-12768: MetricRegistryMBean doesn't show histogram
> >>>>>>> values in case when histogram name contains underscore character
> >> (#7542)
> >>>>>>>> 8246bd8427 IGNITE-12746 Regression in GridCacheColocatedDebugTest:
> >>>>>>> putAll of sorted keys causes deadlock - Fixes #7507.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> CLOSED WITHOUT FIX:
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12775 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-7414 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10477 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-8625 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-11862 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10313 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-10011 = 0
> >>>>>>>> IGNITE-12767 = 0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 19:58, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, I will keep the original ticket in patch available then and
> >>>>>>> leave a
> >>>>>>>>> comment.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Let us know if need any help with moving commits to the release
> >>>>>> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 18:18, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org
> >>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Please, don’t cherry pick tickets to 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>> It seems I have to cherry pick many previous tickets for 2.8.1 to
> >>>>>> avoid
> >>>>>>>>>> conflicts.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 18:01, Alexey Goncharuk <
> >>>>>>> alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> If I merge a ticket that is already targeted for 2.8.1 to
> >> master, do
> >>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>>>>> prefer this ticket to be cherry-picket to 2.8.1 yourself or
> >> should I
> >>>>>>>>>> merge
> >>>>>>>>>>> it to the release branch?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 16:55, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com
> >>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:48, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, let’s try it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know who is a manager for 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:42, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it seems to be a good thing, is not it? I suppose it
> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> important to know who is a release manager (the current thread
> >>>>>>> subject
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has a "Manager" keyword). E.g. I do not know who is a manager
> >> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 12:27, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Should not we reflect on the release page [1] who is a
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We didn’t it for the previous releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why we should start to do it?)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, included.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 12:20, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest to include these fixes into 2.8.1 release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12101
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12651
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:32 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <
> >>>>>>>>>> vololo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A side note from an external spectator. Should not we
> >> reflect
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release page [1] who is a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пт, 17 апр. 2020 г. в 11:11, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’ve added all tickets proposed in this thread to 2.8.1
> >> scope
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For now we have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 61 resolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 unresolved tickets.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17 апр. 2020 г., в 01:38, Alex Plehanov <
> >>>>>>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to cherry-pick to 2.8.1 following bug-fixes
> >> too,
> >>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already in master:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scan query over an evicted partition can cause node
> >> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: There were problems with
> >> deserialization
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> types on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the client-side, these types can't be used (IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2], IGNITE-12468 [3])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java thin client: Thread doesn't stop properly on client
> >>>>>> close
> >>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition awareness is enabled, this prevents main()
> >> method
> >>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exiting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IGNITE-12743 [4])
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there is a performance fix for checkpoint read
> >> lock,
> >>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to cherry-pick too (IGNITE-12491 [5]). This fix brings
> >>>>>>>>>> significant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance boost on environments with a large number of
> >>>>>> CPUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> (there
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some drop on such environments introduced in 2.8.0 for
> >> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transactional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations after IGNITE-12593 fixing)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12734
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12624
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12468
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12743
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12491
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 18:48, Maxim Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nikolay,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Probably, we should not wait for all blocker issues in
> >>>>>> minor
> >>>>>>>>>>>> bug-fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases except very special cases. I think we should
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulated bug-fixes `as is` and schedule the next
> >> 2.8.2
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This will allow as to have shorten minor releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 18:17, Nikolay Izhikov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I’m started to work on this 2.8.1 release [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Resolved issues for release(28) - [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unresolved issues for release(30) - [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My next step:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I want to double-check that all commits for the
> >> tickets
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fixVersion=2.8.1 presented in corresponding release
> >> branch.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And cherry-pick losted changes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I want to reduce the scope of the release and
> >> exclude
> >>>>>>>>>> tickets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not ready for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you may know, 2.8.1 is a bug fix release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, I think we can wait only for a blocker
> >> issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20and%20status%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=(project%20%3D%20%27Ignite%27%20AND%20fixVersion%20is%20not%20empty%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(%272.8.1%27))%20AND%20(component%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20component%20not%20in%20(documentation))%20%20and%20status%20not%20in%20(%27CLOSED%27%2C%20%27RESOLVED%27)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8 апр. 2020 г., в 20:15, Вячеслав Коптилин <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slava.kopti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12805
> >> "NullPointerException
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restart
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when 3rd party persistence and Ignite native
> >> persistence
> >>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> used"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12805
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> S.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 19:57, Ilya Kasnacheev <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 7 апр. 2020 г. в 12:31, Sergey <
> >>>>>> macrerg...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm proposing to add
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12549
> >>>>>> (fix
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iterators/scan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> queries for replicated caches)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kosarev.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 01:22, Saikat Maitra <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I observed that we already have release 2.8.1
> >> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we should be ok to merge these 2 open
> >> PRs
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> master
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available for 2.9.0 release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7240
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7227
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please review and confirm?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Saikat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:19 AM Maxim Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I support Nikolay Izhikov as the release manager
> >> of
> >>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignite release. Since no one else of committers,
> >> PMCs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> expressed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> desire to lead this release I think we can close
> >> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>> question
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> focus on the release scope and dates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You helped me configuring TC.Bot that time, can
> >> you
> >>>>>>> please
> >>>>>>>>>>>> help
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and set `ignite-2.8.1` branch for guard under
> >> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start collecting TC statistics for the release
> >> branch
> >>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> early
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:48, Taras Ledkov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tled...@gridgain.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to add the issue [1] related to SQL
> >> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>> execution
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had omitted this case and Ignite 2.8 contains
> >>>>>>> serious
> >>>>>>>>>>>> SQL
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cursor of a local query is not thread-safe.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is root cause of several SQL issue, e.g. JDBC
> >>>>>> thin
> >>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execute query  from replicated cache,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PME may hang after execute such queries from JDBC
> >>>>>>> thin,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12800
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19.03.2020 17:52, Denis Magda wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As long as 2.8.1 is inevitable and we already
> >> keep
> >>>>>>>>>> adding
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> critical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the working queue, let's settle on the
> >> release
> >>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>> frames
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who will be a release manager. This is the time
> >>>>>>> proposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> personally, I concur with such a schedule:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Scope Freeze: April 15, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Code Freeze: April 22, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Voting Date: April 27, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release Date: May 1, 2020
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we agree on this time? Is there anybody who
> >>>>>> ready
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> drive
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as a release manager?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 5:50 AM Sergey Antonov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> antonovserge...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to add ticket IGNITE-12774 Transaction
> >>>>>>> hangs
> >>>>>>>>>>>> after
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> too
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files NIO exception [1] to ignite-2.8.1 scope.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12774
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 18 мар. 2020 г. в 16:53, Maxim Muzafarov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we add ignite-2.8.1 [2] branch under
> >> TC.Bot
> >>>>>>>>>>>> protection
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://mtcga.gridgain.com/guard.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/ignite-2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 16:32, Alexey Goncharuk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've walked through all the commits to master
> >>>>>>> since
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filtered some tickets that in my opinion are
> >>>>>> worth
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.8.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release below (note that they are ready end
> >> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> effort of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> including
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release should be low as long as there
> >> are
> >>>>>> no
> >>>>>>>>>>>> implicit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> between tickets). Please share your opinion
> >> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> whether we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them to the 2.8.1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12717 SQL: index creation refactoring
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12590 MERGE INTO query is failing on
> >>>>>> Ignite
> >>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12671 Update of partition's states can
> >>>>>>> stuck
> >>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebalance
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> completed during exchange
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11798 Memory leak on unstable topology
> >>>>>>> caused
> >>>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reservation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12665 SQL: Potential race on MapResult
> >>>>>>> close.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12605 Historical (WAL) rebalance can
> >>>>>> start
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cleared
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> partition
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some baseline node leaves the cluster and
> >> then
> >>>>>>> joins
> >>>>>>>>>>>> back.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12654 Some of rentingFutures in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accumulate a huge number of eviction
> >> callbacks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12631 Incorrect rewriting wal record
> >> type
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marshalled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> iteration
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12621 Node leave may cause
> >>>>>>>>>> NullPointerException
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IO
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processing if security is enabled
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12636 Full rebalance instead of a
> >>>>>>> historical
> >>>>>>>>>>>> one
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12618 Affinity cache for version of
> >> last
> >>>>>>>>>> server
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from history
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12013 NullPointerException is thrown
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ExchangeLatchManager
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache creation
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-11797 Fix consistency issues for
> >> atomic
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tx-atomic
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> groups.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12557 Destroy of big cache which is
> >> not
> >>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes IgniteOOME
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12567 H2Tree goes into illegal state
> >> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-indexed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> columns
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dropped
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12569 Can't set serialized enum to a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> BinaryObject's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12460 Cluster fails to find the node
> >> by
> >>>>>>>>>>>> consistent
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12459 Searching checkpoint record in
> >> WAL
> >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> segment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compaction
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12548 Possible tx desync during
> >> recovery
> >>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> near
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> node
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> left.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12546 Prevent partitions owned by
> >> other
> >>>>>>> nodes
> >>>>>>>>>>>> switch
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MOVING due to counter difference on node
> >> join.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12551 Partition desync if a partition
> >> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> evicted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> then
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> owned
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and historically rebalanced
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12536 Inconsistency between cache data
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>> indexes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operation is interrupted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12403 Throttle page difference output
> >> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PageMemoryTracker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12523 Continuously generated thread
> >> dumps
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> failure
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processor
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> slow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> down the whole system
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-12489 Error during purges by
> >> expiration:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BR, Sergey Antonov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Taras Ledkov
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mail-To: tled...@gridgain.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Sincerely yours,
> >>>>>> Ivan Bessonov
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours,
> > Ivan Bessonov
>

Reply via email to