> All static final object reference types that are never followed by "."
(dot)
With this way of thinking we can say that everything is a constant if we
don't change it - no need for static final.
"Constant" is usually something that you can't change, even you want -
compiler won't let you.
In Java that would be static final primitives and read-only objects like
String.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:25 PM Pavel Pereslegin <xxt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Maxim,
>
> > But what exactly is `constant` means?! I'd suggest applying this rule
> > to all class fields with `static final` modifiers without any clauses.
> > (check Java Naming convention [2] paragraph 3.3).
>
> I disagree with this and want to clarify what exactly the Java naming
> convention says:
>
> >> The following are considered to be constants:
> >> 1. All static final primitive types (Remember that all interface fields
> are inherently static final).
> >> 2. All static final object reference types that are never followed by
> "." (dot).
> >> 3. All static final arrays that are never followed by"[" (dot)
>
> I don't see that convention says "any static final field".
>
> пт, 24 апр. 2020 г. в 20:11, Sergey Antonov <antonovserge...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Maxim, It's a good idea!
> >
> > Please don't forget to update out code style guidelines too.
> >
> > Thank you for keeping the code cleaner!
> >
> > пт, 24 апр. 2020 г. в 19:49, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > >
> > > It is not directly mentioned through the Apache Ignite Coding
> > > Guidelines [1] about naming the `static final` class fields using only
> > > upper-case letters. I'd like to suggest to fill this gap.
> > >
> > > > Constants should all be upper-case.
> > > But what exactly is `constant` means?! I'd suggest applying this rule
> > > to all class fields with `static final` modifiers without any clauses.
> > > (check Java Naming convention [2] paragraph 3.3).
> > >
> > >
> > > I've prepared PR [3] with capitalizing letters on all of the constant
> > > names simultaneously with supporting the standard ConstantName
> > > checkstyle [4] rule.
> > >
> > > Can we proceed with this change?
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines#CodingGuidelines-Naming
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://web.archive.org/web/20120911192801/developers.sun.com/sunstudio/products/archive/whitepapers/java-style.pdf
> > > [3] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/7662
> > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12888
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > BR, Sergey Antonov
>

Reply via email to