Hello! I think we should move it to a separate repository, but not Attic.
I can see the scenario where there would be recurrence of interest to this tool and somebody may step in to update it. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 6 мая 2020 г. в 22:20, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > Folks, > > Personally, I like the idea of Apache Attic [1] suggested by Saikat. We are > not discontinuing Ignite WebConsole because it became useless like it was > with Hadoop Accelerator. The tool has good capabilities such as the > configuration wizard, and the only problem is that we no longer want to > support or maintain this technology (while it has the right to exist). > > Is anybody interested in figuring out with the ASF-mates if Ignite > WebConsole can be accepted to Attic? The Attic's guidelines talk about an > ASF project as a whole and not about individual components. > > [1] https://attic.apache.org > > - > Denis > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 7:20 AM Вячеслав Коптилин <slava.kopti...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > +1 to remove this component or move it to a separate repository if > someone > > wants to maintain it. > > In case the web console provides useful features, we should consider how > to > > add them to our command-line utilities, if possible. > > > > Thanks, > > Slava. > > > > ср, 6 мая 2020 г. в 16:10, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>: > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > +1 to remove any graphical utilities from the Ignite core. > > > I think we should maintain and support only cmd, JMX, and other «core» > > > tools. > > > > > > We shouldn't waste our resources on supporting pretty looking UI tools. > > > > > > > > > > 2 мая 2020 г., в 04:05, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com> > > > написал(а): > > > > > > > > Hello Denis, > > > > > > > > I am thinking if we should move web-console to a separate repo like > > > > ignite-web-console. In my opinion the tech stack we have in > web-console > > > > like npm, nodejs and Mondodb etc are little different and can be > hosted > > > as > > > > a separate project in a git repo. > > > > > > > > I had used web-console for streamers project and found it helpful in > > > > creating table schema and execute sql queries and also to do cache > > > lookup. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/samaitra/streamers > > > > > > > > If we continue to find that usage of ignite-web-console is limited > then > > > we > > > > can plan moving ignite-web-console in Apache Attic > > > > > > > > https://attic.apache.org/ > > > > > > > > Please let me know your thoughts. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Saikat > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 12:43 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Igniters, > > > >> > > > >> I would like to hear your opinion on what we should do with Ignite > > > >> WebConsole. > > > >> > > > >> To my knowledge, we don't have active maintainers of the component, > > and > > > a > > > >> list of issues is piling up [1]. Users even report that the docker > > > images > > > >> have not been updated for more than a year [2]. > > > >> > > > >> Personally, I share the opinion of those who believe the community > > > needs to > > > >> provide and support all the essential tooling (metrics and tracing > > API, > > > >> command-line tool) while the UI tools are not our business. There > is a > > > >> myriad of UI tools Ignite can be monitored and traced with. Users > > > already > > > >> have plenty of choices. > > > >> > > > >> What are your thoughts? Probably, some of you want to become > > > maintainers of > > > >> the component. Otherwise, we should let the tool go. > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12923?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%20text%20~%20%22web%20console%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open%20and%20type%20%3D%20Bug%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20 > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12923 > > > >> > > > >> - > > > >> Denis > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
