Guys, Any updates here? Looks like we still don't have a consensus about release version for this patch (already mention it in the release thread). Currently, the ticket is still targeted to 2.9.
ср, 15 июл. 2020 г. в 00:40, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > I don't think it's required to wait until Ignite 3.0 to make this happen. > If I'm not mistaken, we stopped releasing Hadoop binaries and sources a > long time ago (at least you can't longer find them on the downloads page). > Also, we removed all the mentioning from the documentation and website. > Nobody complained or requested for a maintenance release since that time. > Thus, I would remove the integration in 2.9. If anybody shows up later then > they can use the sources in the 2.8 branch and do whatever they want. > > - > Denis > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:52 AM Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > We are breaking backwards compatibility, > > so this can be only done for Ignite 3.0, am I right? > > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Anton Kalashnikov <kaa....@yandex.ru> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > The task of removal IGFS and Hadoop accelerator is ready to review.( > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942) > > > I've already asked some guys to take a look at it but if somebody > > familiar > > > with this part of code, feel free to take a look at the changes > > > too(especially scripts changes). > > > > > > I also think it is good to decide which release it should be planned > on. > > > This task planned for 2.9 right now but I should notice that first of > all > > > there are a lot of changes and secondly there are some changes in > public > > > API(removed some methods from configuration). So maybe it makes sense > to > > > move this ticket to the next release. What do you think? > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > > > > > > > 10.02.2020, 15:45, "Alexey Zinoviev" <zaleslaw....@gmail.com>: > > > > Thank you so you much! Will wait:) > > > > > > > > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 15:13, Alexey Goncharuk < > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > >> Got it, then no need to rush, let's wait for the TF-IGFS > decoupling. > > > >> > > > >> пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 13:15, Alexey Zinoviev < > > zaleslaw....@gmail.com > > > >: > > > >> > > > >> > Tensorflow integration uses IGFS, if you have any idea how to > store > > > files > > > >> > in memory by another way, please suggest something. > > > >> > I hope to decouple Ignite-TF integration to the separate > repository > > > >> before > > > >> > release 2.9 with its own file system over Ignite Caches > > > >> > > > > >> > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 12:49, Ivan Pavlukhin < > vololo...@gmail.com > > >: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Is not it blocked by > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10292 as stated > in > > > JIRA? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > @Alex Zinoviev could you please shed some light on this? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Best regards, > > > >> > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > >> > > > > > >> > > пн, 10 февр. 2020 г. в 12:46, Anton Kalashnikov < > > kaa....@yandex.ru > > > >: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I found the correct ticket for such activity - > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11942 > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > Best regards, > > > >> > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > 10.02.2020, 12:16, "Anton Kalashnikov" <kaa....@yandex.ru>: > > > >> > > > > Hello. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I created a ticket for this activity - > > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12647. And if we > > are > > > >> still > > > >> > > in consensus I'll do it at the nearest time(I've already had > the > > > >> prepared > > > >> > > code). > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > Best regards, > > > >> > > > > Anton Kalashnikov > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 10.02.2020, 12:07, "Alexey Goncharuk" < > > > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com > > > >> >: > > > >> > > > >> Folks, > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I think there is a consensus here, but we did not remove > > IGFS > > > >> > > neither in > > > >> > > > >> 2.7 nor in 2.8, did we? Should we schedule a corresponding > > > ticket > > > >> > > for 2.9? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
