Hello, Ilya! I agree that it would be better if we found a common approach, but I haven't found one yet.
07.09.2020, 18:50, "Ilya Kasnacheev" <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: > Hello! > > Not everyone is using bash, which leads me to question whether there's any > common approach where we can hint a shell what our executable can do so > that it can discover and auto-complete our control.sh > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > пн, 7 сент. 2020 г. в 17:47, ткаленко кирилл <tkalkir...@yandex.ru>: > >> Hello, folks! >> >> I spent time to analyze the possibility of adding auto completion for the >> "control.sh" with the [1]. >> >> To do this, at the beginning, we need to adapt the "control.sh" code to >> [1], then we can automatically create a "bash completion script" via [2], >> and then install it, for example, with the "source" command and the >> "control.sh" script itself via "install". >> >> This is only possible for nix systems. >> >> It is theoretically possible to add the "control.sh" extension via plugins >> and auto-generate "bash completion script". >> >> Thus, I propose a plan: >> 1)Adapt "control.sh" to [1]; >> 2)Automatic creation of "bash completion script" for the release build; >> 3)Adding extensibility "control.sh" and automatic re-creation of "bash >> completion script". (optional) >> >> What do you think, comments? >> >> [1] - https://picocli.info/ >> [2] - >> https://picocli.info/autocomplete.html#_completion_script_generation_details
