Hello, This idea looks great in my opinion. I agree that a more common approach would be better but I am the same as Kirill haven't found the better one. So in my point of view, this library is better than nothing, and if nobody will recommend a different one we can take picocli right now.
-- Best regards, Anton Kalashnikov 14.09.2020, 13:15, "Данилов Семён" <samvi...@yandex.ru>: > Hello! > > I've looked through the picocli manual and it looks really great. > We will be able easily add i18n and stuff like this. > Nevertheless, we will get rid of the manual formatting of examples and help > texts. > > Kind regards, > Semyon. > > 14.09.2020, 13:00, "Alexey Goncharuk" <alexey.goncha...@gmail.com>: >> Hi folks, >> >> Despite the autocompletion support only for bash, I see the following >> benefits from this change: >> * It may unify all the CLI tooliing in Ignite, providing a better user >> experience >> * The library has an ability to generate man pages, which may be nice >> * I see there is an open issue for adding support to powershell, so >> Windows platform will be also somewhat covered >> >> Overall, I support this idea. >> >> вт, 8 сент. 2020 г. в 10:43, ткаленко кирилл <tkalkir...@yandex.ru>: >> >>> Hello, Ilya! >>> >>> I agree that it would be better if we found a common approach, but I >>> haven't found one yet. >>> >>> 07.09.2020, 18:50, "Ilya Kasnacheev" <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com>: >>> > Hello! >>> > >>> > Not everyone is using bash, which leads me to question whether there's >>> any >>> > common approach where we can hint a shell what our executable can do so >>> > that it can discover and auto-complete our control.sh >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > -- >>> > Ilya Kasnacheev >>> > >>> > пн, 7 сент. 2020 г. в 17:47, ткаленко кирилл <tkalkir...@yandex.ru>: >>> > >>> >> Hello, folks! >>> >> >>> >> I spent time to analyze the possibility of adding auto completion for >>> the >>> >> "control.sh" with the [1]. >>> >> >>> >> To do this, at the beginning, we need to adapt the "control.sh" code to >>> >> [1], then we can automatically create a "bash completion script" via >>> [2], >>> >> and then install it, for example, with the "source" command and the >>> >> "control.sh" script itself via "install". >>> >> >>> >> This is only possible for nix systems. >>> >> >>> >> It is theoretically possible to add the "control.sh" extension via >>> plugins >>> >> and auto-generate "bash completion script". >>> >> >>> >> Thus, I propose a plan: >>> >> 1)Adapt "control.sh" to [1]; >>> >> 2)Automatic creation of "bash completion script" for the release build; >>> >> 3)Adding extensibility "control.sh" and automatic re-creation of "bash >>> >> completion script". (optional) >>> >> >>> >> What do you think, comments? >>> >> >>> >> [1] - https://picocli.info/ >>> >> [2] - >>> >> >>> >>> https://picocli.info/autocomplete.html#_completion_script_generation_details
