+ for both

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin Orlov


> On 20 Jul 2021, at 16:32, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Agree with for both points
> 
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:14 PM Alexander Polovtcev <alexpolovt...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> this is a very welcome change for me
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:13 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> + for both points.
>>> 
>>> 2021-07-20 9:56 GMT+03:00, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi!
>>>> 
>>>> Firstly, lets talk about interfaces.
>>>> 
>>>> 1. First of all, do we have an automatic inspection for it? AFAIK we
>>> don't
>>>> 2. I am for consistency. At least for production code. Nothing worse is
>>>> when someone mixes both approaches.
>>>> 
>>>> About a prohibition of curly brackets around one line -- I am strongly
>>>> against this rule, it should be removed. There were a few bugs that
>> this
>>>> rule caused.
>>>> 
>>>> вт, 20 июл. 2021 г. в 09:23, Zhenya Stanilovsky
>>> <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid
>>>>> :
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Igniters, i understand that this is very long and fundamental story.
>> but
>>>>> … still want to rise up this discussion, we have 2 very strange
>>>>> inspections:
>>>>> *  «public» modifier in interface methods.
>>>>> *  Illegal ‘{}’ for one line statement. — i found it harmful.
>>>>> I don`t want to link additional discussion about pos. 2 i think that
>>> harm
>>>>> is obvious.
>>>>> I suggest to get rid of them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> what do you think ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> With regards,
>> Aleksandr Polovtcev
>> 

Reply via email to