Atri. Right now code can’t be tested because it doesn’t compile.
> 3 сент. 2021 г., в 17:42, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> написал(а): > > I am not sure why is it can be tested by few members? > > Anyone with azure account should be able to test it > > On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 19:29 Maxim Muzafarov, <mmu...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> The GCP and AWS should also be moved to extensions, but this is a >> discussion for another topic. >> >> I trust you all :-) >> But who can validate the patch [1]? This is a bad practice that only a >> few members be able to test the code. >> >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388 >> >> On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 16:43, Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> It was extensively tested by myself (running the tests on an actual Azure >>> account and running an Ignite cluster using an Azure account) and Ilya >>> (thanks Ilya!) prior to merging it in the core >>> >>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 18:50 Denis Magda, <dma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Disagree to exclude this contribution from the 2.11 release. As Atri >>>> explained, its implementation and testing approach is identical to the >> AWS, >>>> GCP and Kubernetes IP finders. >>>> If we want to move the modules to extensions and improve the testing >>>> approach, then it needs to be done for all similar components. >>>> >>>> Atri, have you tested the module in the cloud? If it works, then I >> don't >>>> see any reason why we need to have someone else double-checking this >> once >>>> again. This is the community, we need to trust each other. >>>> >>>> - >>>> Denis >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:15 AM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would argue that the module Co exists with the other IP discovery >>>> modules >>>>> (such as GCP and AWS), which are part of core. >>>>> >>>>> In terms of tests, the azure module has exactly the same type of >> tests as >>>>> the other two modules mentioned above. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, 17:54 Maxim Muzafarov, <mmu...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Folks, >>>>>> >>>>>> The patch [1] for the azure module seems to be ready for review, >>>>>> however, there are still some questions that exist: >>>>>> - Do we have a technical account in azure to test the moude on TC? >>>>>> Manual testing for such changes is really annoying. >>>>>> - Is there any reason to add these changes to the main Apache >> Ignite >>>>>> project? Why not extensions? >>>>>> - It seems there is a lack of tests for this module. >>>>>> >>>>>> According to the mentions above, what do you think about moving >> this >>>>>> functionality to the next 2.12 release to solve all the questions >>>>>> without a rush? I propose to revert the changes related to the >> azure >>>>>> functionality from the 2.11 branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 20:53, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We had a separate discussion with Max and Alex, so I tend to >> agree >>>> that >>>>>>> both issues are blockers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov >>>>>>> >>>>>>> пт, 27 авг. 2021 г. в 16:41, Alexey Gidaspov < >> olive.c...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, Maxim! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These issues really block release. So we should wait fixes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2021/08/27 12:46:24, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've been faced these issues, which seems to be a blocker >> for the >>>>>>>>> release. Please, take a look and share your thoughts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The server node fails when the client node with the higher >> java >>>>>>>>> version connects to it [1]. >>>>>>>>> The Apache Ignite build fails with missing dependency [2]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14725 >>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15388 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 16:56, Maxim Muzafarov < >> mmu...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2021 at 16:27, Ivan Daschinsky < >>>>> ivanda...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose, that >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15274 >>>>>>>> is a >>>>>>>>>>> blocker. >>>>>>>>>>> Fix is quite easy and straightforward >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> пн, 2 авг. 2021 г. в 03:11, Igor Sapego < >> isap...@apache.org >>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cherry-picked to release branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 3:11 PM Alexey Gidaspov < >>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I think we should add [1] to 2.11 release. Can >> you >>>>>>>> cherry-pick it to >>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch? >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14815 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/30 02:25:25, Igor Sapego < >> isap...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with any of these two solutions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:36 PM Ilya Kasnacheev < >>>>>>>>>>>>> ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it does make sense to include changes >> which >>>>> will >>>>>> let >>>>>>>> us avoid >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> migration issues in the future. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alternatively, maybe we can revert the incomplete >>>>> change >>>>>>>> from 2.11 in >>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to reintroduce it in 2.12 in full form if Igor >> agrees >>>>>> and RE >>>>>>>> thinks >>>>>>>>>>>>> this is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the best course of action. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ilya Kasnacheev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 29 июл. 2021 г. в 18:07, Igor Sapego < >>>>>> isap...@apache.org >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It contains changes we could not introduce if >> we >>>>>> release >>>>>>>> ignite in >>>>>>>>>>>>> its >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current state as they are going to be breaking >>>>> changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:13 PM Alexey >> Gidaspov < >>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Igor! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now we are in stabilization phase and >> accepting >>>>> only >>>>>>>> blockers. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> may be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong, but this ticket doesn't seem to be of >> that >>>>>> kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/28 21:00:15, Igor Sapego < >>>>>> isap...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest adding [1] to the scope of >> release, >>>>>> because >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> contains >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes to code introduced by [2], which is >>>>> already >>>>>>>> included in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14815 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14658 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:30 PM Maxim >>>> Muzafarov >>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The issues mentioned above were >> successfully >>>>>>>> resolved and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked to the ignite-2.11 branch. >>>> Sorry >>>>>> for >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> delay. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can proceed with the release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:44, Maxim >>>> Muzafarov < >>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, both the fixes [1] [2] will not >>>> require >>>>>>>> performance >>>>>>>>>>>>> tests >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rerun. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 at 15:30, Dmitry >>>> Pavlov < >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpav...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I personally trust opinion of >> Nikolay and >>>>>> Maxim, >>>>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consider >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as blockers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just an idea to consider: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For fixed ticket/PR ( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170) >>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>>>>>>> likely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need to re-run performance tests. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If second issue has no impact on >>>>>> performance, we >>>>>>>> can take >>>>>>>>>>>>> perf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from rc.-1 and run only functional tests >> for >>>>>> rc.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/22 04:44:01, "Николай >> Ижиков" >>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>> nizhi...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to fix both prior to release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Отправлено с iPhone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22 июля 2021 г., в 02:36, Maxim >>>>>> Muzafarov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал(а): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've faced [1][2] issues >> related to >>>>> the >>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> added to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 2.11 release (it will be >> safe to >>>>>> merge >>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my point of view, both of >> them >>>> are >>>>>>>> critical and >>>>>>>>>>>>> must >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> included >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the 2.11 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The [2] is ready for merge. The >> [1] >>>>> will >>>>>> be >>>>>>>> completed >>>>>>>>>>>>> by >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of this week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please share your thoughts. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15146 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15170 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 15:08, >> Maxim >>>>>>>> Muzafarov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mmu...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the release branch was >> created >>>>>> some >>>>>>>> time ago, >>>>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bump up >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the master branch version to the >>>> next >>>>>> one? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 17:15, >> Alexey >>>>>>>> Gidaspov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Pavel. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think, it looks like blocker. >>>>> Please >>>>>>>> cherry-pick >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/07/01 09:29:57, Pavel >>>>>> Pereslegin < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> xxt...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to include a >> hotfix >>>>>> that >>>>>>>> corrects >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> command >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> syntax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output in the control script? >> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bug can significantly >>>>> complicate >>>>>> the >>>>>>>> use of >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> restore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> function (one of the important >>>>>> features >>>>>>>> of 2.11). >>>>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may raise a number of >> questions to >>>>> the >>>>>>>> product >>>>>>>>>>>>> support, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevent by adding this patch >> in >>>>> 2.11. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This patch does not affect any >>>>>> functions >>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "help" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the control script. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14989 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> чт, 1 июл. 2021 г. в 11:56, >> Alexey >>>>>>>> Gidaspov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Iilya! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I can see, this feature >> highly >>>>>>>> improves >>>>>>>>>>>>> debugging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> during >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incidents. So I think we can call it >> blocker >>>>> and >>>>>>>> cherry-pick >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/30 20:26:43, >> Shishkov >>>>>> Ilya < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shishkovi...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible to add system >>>> views >>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> BaselineNode >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributes [1] and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding documentation >> [2] >>>> to >>>>>> 2.11? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15007 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15028 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в 11:07, >>>>> Nikita >>>>>>>> Amelchev < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> namelc...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I have >> cherry-picked >>>> the >>>>>>>> commit to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ср, 30 июн. 2021 г. в >> 11:00, >>>>> Alexey >>>>>>>> Gidaspov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, Nikita! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's important >> fix and >>>>>> should >>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>> included in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release. I've >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged ticket by fixVersion >>>> 2.11. >>>>>> Can >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-pick >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ignite-2.11 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branch? And please fill >> release >>>>>> notes >>>>>>>> or delete >>>>>>>>>>>>> flag. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/30 07:55:04, >> Nikita >>>>>>>> Amelchev < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> namelc...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, Alexey. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest adding to the >> 2.11 >>>>>> scope >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> incorrect values of >> cache, >>>>> cache >>>>>>>> groups, data >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> region >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metrics after >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cluster reactivation. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14990 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> вт, 29 июн. 2021 г. в >> 15:09, >>>>>> Alexey >>>>>>>> Gidaspov >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olive.c...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, we can add this fix >> to >>>>>> release >>>>>>>> scope. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/29 08:36:00, >>>> Сурков >>>>>>>> Александр >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Викторович<surkov.a....@sberbank.ru.INVALID> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alexey. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think need add >> ticket: >>>>>>>> JmxMetricExporter >>>>>>>>>>>>> fails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> export >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery metrics - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14376 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2021/06/15 14:43:55, >>>>> Alexey >>>>>>>> Gidaspov < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> o...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite 2.11 >> Code >>>>> Freeze >>>>>>>> started >>>>>>>>>>>> now> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best wishes, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amelchev Nikita >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
