It is the last point in the wishlist that probably nobody cares about.
I see no discussion at all, no @Deprecation annotations and a lot of
abandoned and broken code only.

пт, 3 дек. 2021 г. в 11:01, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>:

> Ivan,
>
> It seems shmem is already in the remove list [1].
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+3.0+Wishlist
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:42, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > So if nobody wants it to resurrect, maybe it is worth removing it?
> >
> >
> > пт, 3 дек. 2021 г. в 09:25, Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Latest that I heard that it literally was never in use.
> > >
> > > 2021-11-29 19:44 GMT+03:00, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
> > > > There is JNI library in ipc/shmem directory. It even compiles with
> > > minimal
> > > > modification on modern gcc (9.3.0)
> > > > But there is no script to build jar with native library.
> > > >
> > > > May be it is possible to create separate module, refactor it a bit,
> > > change
> > > > build process (CMake)?
> > > > Is there a technical reason why it is abandoned?
> > > >
> > > > пн, 29 нояб. 2021 г. в 19:24, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> Guys, what is the status of ignite-shmem and TcpCommunication
> through
> > > it?
> > > >>
> > > >> 1. Native part has not been built at all since 2015
> > > >> 2. It is currently broken in master -- I've fixed some NPE and
> metrics
> > > >> conversion locally and it works for me. It is broken for almost a
> year.
> > > >> 3. GridShmemCommunicationClient is not covered by tests.
> > > >>
> > > >> What do you think we should do with this?
> > > >>
> > > >> сб, 27 нояб. 2021 г. в 23:32, Vyacheslav Daradur <
> daradu...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> LGTM. Merged to master.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thank you for your contribution!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 12:20 PM Maxim Muzafarov <
> mmu...@apache.org>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> > Folks,
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > This is a friendly reminder :-)
> > > >>> > PR [1] is ready for review. Will anyone take a look?
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9577/files
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 03:17, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Folks,
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > I've prepared the changes related to the legacy Service Grid
> > > removal
> > > >>> > > for the 2.13 release. Here is the issue [1] and the PR [2] of
> these
> > > >>> > > changes.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Some important notes:
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > - Removed GridServiceProcessor legacy implementation (internal)
> > > >>> > > - The IGNITE_EVENT_DRIVEN_SERVICE_PROCESSOR_ENABLED system
> property
> > > >>> > > was removed (this is a breaking change)
> > > >>> > > - The ATTR_EVENT_DRIVEN_SERVICE_PROCESSOR_ENABLED node
> attribute
> > > was
> > > >>> > > removed (this is a breaking change)
> > > >>> > > - The node with 2.13 won't be able to connect to 2.12 (assume
> > > Ignite
> > > >>> > > services are used)
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > The legacy test suite [3] will be removed after the [1] issue
> will
> > > >>> > > be
> > > >>> > merged.
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > Who can take a look at this PR?
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15758
> > > >>> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9577/files
> > > >>> > > [3]
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewType.html?buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_ServiceGridLegacyMode
> > > >>> > >
> > > >>> > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 12:43, Nikolay Izhikov <
> nizhi...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Hello.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > In the scope of IEP-80 Breaking changes in Ignite-2.x PR for
> the
> > > >>> > following API are prepared:
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > 1. MVCC
> > > >>> > > >     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15757
> > > >>> > > >     - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9516
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > 2. LOCAL caches
> > > >>> > > >     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15756
> > > >>> > > >     - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9515
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > 3. CacheConfiguration#rebalanceDelay
> > > >>> > > >     - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15764
> > > >>> > > >     - https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/9515
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > Please, review.
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> > > > > 15 окт. 2021 г., в 16:23, Nikolay Izhikov
> > > >>> > > > > <nizhikov....@gmail.com
> > > >>> >
> > > >>> > написал(а):
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > THanks, Maksim.
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > > Tickets included in IEP scope and marked for d&r in
> 2.12-2.13
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > > >> 15 окт. 2021 г., в 16:03, Maxim Muzafarov <
> mmu...@apache.org>
> > > >>> > написал(а):
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> Let's deprecate RebalanceDelay and RebalanceMode=NONE
> also.
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12662
> > > >>> > > > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14613
> > > >>> > > > >>
> > > >>> > > > >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 at 15:46, Anton Vinogradov <
> a...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >>> > wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> > > > >>> +1
> > > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> > > > >>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:41 PM Nikita Amelchev <
> > > >>> > namelc...@apache.org>
> > > >>> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>> > > > >>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>> +1 for deprecation in the 2.12 release
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>> пт, 15 окт. 2021 г. в 15:35, Nikolay Izhikov <
> > > >>> nizhi...@apache.org
> > > >>> > >:
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Hello, Igniters.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> I’ve prepared IEP-80 [1] to track breaking changes that
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> should
> > > >>> > be done
> > > >>> > > > >>>> in Ignite 2.x.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> We agreed on the following algorithm to deal with
> breaking
> > > >>> > changes:
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - Ignite 2.[x] - deprecate the API + notification of
> the
> > > >>> users.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - Ignite 2.[x+1] - API removal.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> I propose to start these improvements with the d&r
> > > >>> (depuration &
> > > >>> > > > >>>> removal) of the following features:
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - LOCAL caches
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - MVCC caches
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - legacy service grid implementation
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>   - legacy JMX metrics beans.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Deprecation in 2.12
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Removal in 2.13
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> Please, share your opinion.
> > > >>> > > > >>>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>> [1]
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=191334475
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >>>> --
> > > >>> > > > >>>> Best wishes,
> > > >>> > > > >>>> Amelchev Nikita
> > > >>> > > > >>>>
> > > >>> > > > >
> > > >>> > > >
> > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> Best Regards,
> > > >>> Vyacheslav D.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Ivan Pavlukhin
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>


-- 
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Reply via email to