Correct url to rest-http module

https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/21f7ca41c4348909e2fd26ccf59b5b2ce1f4474e/modules/rest-http/pom.xml#L131

On Mon, 20 Dec, 2021, 16:06 Vishwas Bm, <bmvish...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Why is ignite rest module still using old log4j version dependency?
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/21f7ca41c4348909e2fd26ccf59b5b2ce1f4474e/modules/log4j/pom.xml#L46
>
> Can this be removed ? There is a critical CVE against this package.
>
> Regards,
> Vishwas
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Dec, 2021, 12:57 Aleksandr Nikolaev, <nikolaev...@live.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Ok i'm update log4j version 2.15 to 2.16
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16127
>>
>>
>> On 15.12.2021 09:54, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
>> > Igniters,
>> >
>> > Looks like we need to update to 2.16, there is an additional attack
>> vector
>> > [1]
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day-update-on-cve-2021-45046/
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:06 PM Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Folks,
>> >>
>> >> Should we describe all the WA available for the issue [1]? There is
>> >> already a lot of information about CVE, and nevertheless, it will not
>> >> be superfluous.
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 15:37, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>> Unfortunately, we need patch our Log4j2 adapter in order to work with
>> >>> log4j-2.15
>> >>> So there is no choice other than to release 2.11.1
>> >>>
>> >>> пн, 13 дек. 2021 г. в 15:21, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Folks,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My 200 rubles here,
>> >>>>> I want to include it to the 2.12 scope.
>> >>>> Why not 2.11.1 as well?
>> >>>> We should provide a fixed version for current customers asap.
>> >>>> 2.12 require migration, while 2.11.1 can be applied as-is.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 12:18 PM Stephen Darlington <
>> >>>> stephen.darling...@gridgain.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Another workaround appears to be using the
>> >>>>> -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true option. Also, “Java versions
>> greater
>> >>>> than
>> >>>>> 6u211, 7u201, 8u191, and 11.0.1 are less affected by this attack
>> >> vector,
>> >>>> at
>> >>>>> least in theory, because the JNDI can't load remote code using
>> LDAP.”
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> (
>> >>>>>
>> >>
>> https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2021/12/minecraft-and-other-apps-face-serious-threat-from-new-code-execution-bug/
>> >>>>> )
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 12 Dec 2021, at 10:56, Dmitriy Pavlov <dpav...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Hi Igniters,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Preliminary: change of the log4j version does not affect any tests
>> >>>>>> (Alexander Nikolaev, correct me if I'm wrong).
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> If you're using embedded Ignite, it's perfectly possible to enforce
>> >>>>> jog4j2
>> >>>>>> dependency to be 2.15.0 in your project final pom.xml or
>> >> build.gradle
>> >>>> or
>> >>>>>> any other build system properties.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101 ticket seems
>> >> to be
>> >>>>>> a blocker for 2.12. But for now, as a workaround, it's possible to
>> >>>> select
>> >>>>>> the latest version manually.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Sincerely,
>> >>>>>> Dmitriy Pavlov
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> сб, 11 дек. 2021 г. в 09:47, Nikita Amelchev <namelc...@apache.org
>> >>> :
>> >>>>>>> Hello.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> The issue to update dependency was created:
>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-16101
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I want to include it to the 2.12 scope.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> сб, 11 дек. 2021 г., 09:19 Raymond Wilson <
>> >> raymond_wil...@trimble.com
>> >>>>> :
>> >>>>>>>> All
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> This blew up today: CVE-2021-44228 (
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-zero-day-exploit-for-log4j-java-library-is-an-enterprise-nightmare/
>> >>>>>>>> )
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Will there be a risk assessment with respect to Ignite for this
>> >> CVE?
>> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>> Raymond.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> <http://www.trimble.com/>
>> >>>>>>>> Raymond Wilson
>> >>>>>>>> Trimble Distinguished Engineer, Civil Construction Software (CCS)
>> >>>>>>>> 11 Birmingham Drive | Christchurch, New Zealand
>> >>>>>>>> raymond_wil...@trimble.com
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> <
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>
>> https://worksos.trimble.com/?utm_source=Trimble&utm_medium=emailsign&utm_campaign=Launch
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
>>
>

Reply via email to