+1, sounds reasonable for the open source project. IMHO, Eclipse Temurin
JDK is a rule of thumb choice nowadays.

ср, 30 авг. 2023 г. в 18:40, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>:

> Hi, Igniters!
>
> As part of this proposal I would also like to discuss the JDK vendors we
> are using on our CI platforms TeamCIty.
> Historically, Ignite 2.x is being built under Oracle's edition - mostly
> because of some features like JFR or similar.
> However today we have pretty much solid alternative represented by OpenJDK
> and its most popular build Eclipse Temurin, which provides every required
> version for our needs (and especially LTS versions 1.8, 11 and 17) with all
> necessary updates.
>
> So, I suggest we update our build agents for TeamCity accordingly, provide
> OpenJDK framework for those 3 major versions and discontinue Oracle's
> builds.
> WDYT?
>
> пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:13, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>:
>
> > +1. It's time to do it at last.
> >
> > пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:06, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Mostly, yes.
> > >
> > > In other words - proposal is about starting shipping Apache Ignite
> > releases
> > > with JDK11 compiled binaries thus dropping JDK8-10 runtime support.
> > >
> > > пт, 25 авг. 2023 г. в 12:03, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > I looks like you're proposing not migration to 2.11 (because it is
> > > already
> > > > supported), but Java 8-9 support dropping.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 11:54 AM Peter Ivanov <vvei...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, Igniters!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to propose the next, if you don't mind me saying,
> > > > > revolutionary step forward in our project: moving Ignite 2.x
> > > compilation
> > > > to
> > > > > JDK11 minimum version.
> > > > > I'd rather not make arguments, pros and cons other that currently
> > exist
> > > > in
> > > > > Java world - you know them better than me. Let's just say that it
> > seems
> > > > > that time has come - consider at least that JDK11 as the LTS
> version
> > is
> > > > > already about 4 and a half years on the go, and Ignite 3.x started
> > from
> > > > > JDK11 right away.
> > > > >
> > > > > This change may possibly require from us additional efforts on
> > > supporting
> > > > > the last version with JDK8 in terms of releasing additional patches
> > and
> > > > > hotfixes a bit longer than usual. However, this is up to the
> > community
> > > to
> > > > > decide.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently, Apache Ignite 2.x (with Extensions as well) is already
> > > > prepared
> > > > > for being compiled with JDK11 and almost all tests are passing. If
> we
> > > > come
> > > > > to an agreement about this proposal and designate the next version
> > that
> > > > > will become the first to provide JDK11 compiled binaries - I am
> ready
> > > to
> > > > > start the process of updating the TeamCity building project
> > > accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please, share your thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
> >
>


-- 
Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Reply via email to