No, what I meant is that if all that close should be doing is marking cache as no longer being used instead of cleaning up resources as well, free () out to be a better name.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Ognen Duzlevski <[email protected] > wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Lets look at renaming it to free() or something > > > > I am not sure you can just rename it - it is an implementation of a spec :) > -- Regards, Atri *l'apprenant*
