That clarifies it, thanks! On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Atri, > > JCache already has close and destroy methods, so adding "free()" method > will be confusing at this point. > > D. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No, what I meant is that if all that close should be doing is marking > > cache as no longer being used instead of cleaning up resources as well, > > free () out to be a better name. > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Ognen Duzlevski < > > [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Atri Sharma <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Lets look at renaming it to free() or something > > > > > > > > > > I am not sure you can just rename it - it is an implementation of a > spec > > :) > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Atri > > *l'apprenant* > > > -- Regards, Atri *l'apprenant*
