Hey Zoli!

Just a quick comment about the technical part: Isn't it possible to do an
interactive git rebase (-i option) and then you can mark the unwanted
commits as 'drop' in the commit list.

Cheers,
Gabor


On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:11 PM Zoltan Borok-Nagy <borokna...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the replies. Yeah, it seems reasonable to leave out the risky
> changes.
> I just have a technical question about it. Should we
> a) select an early branching point then do a lot of cherry picks for the
> commits we want in and leave out the risky ones
> b) select a recent branching point then revert the risky commits on the
> release branch
>
> Do we have any other commits that we want to leave out?
>
> Thanks for the link, Tim. I think normally we should wait for all the
> blockers, right? However, on a few of them there were no recent activity.
> Do we know the exact list of Jiras we want to wait on? Please speak up if
> you are working on a Jira that you want to push into 3.1.
>
> Alex: I don't think we can start the process this week. It'd be great if we
> could start it next week. However, it largely depends on the progress of
> the ongoing activities.
>
> Thanks,
>     Zoltan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 8:12 PM Alexandra Rodoni <arod...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Zoltan,
> >
> > When you said, "I propose that we release 3.1.0 soon", how "soon" do you
> > have in mind?
> >
> > I have a few doc tickets for the new features, 3 in reviews, and 3 to
> > start, including the Timezone changes.
> >
> > alex r
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Zoltan Borok-Nagy <
> borokna...@cloudera.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > It's been a while since we last released a minor version of Impala.
> > > 3.0.0 is out since May, and since then a couple of pretty cool features
> > and
> > > a good number of improvements are checked in.
> > >
> > > I propose that we release 3.1.0 soon and I volunteer to be its release
> > > manager. Please speak up and let the community know if anyone has any
> > > objections to this.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >     Zoltan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to